From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Please revert / review
 077fc1c04d70ef1748ac2daa6622b3320a1a004c
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:26:47 +0000
Message-ID: <A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E0AB0043B@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <CABoYbGpyFWPhbA52u7Bys93dVwSsYuHv72LZWh4BPLJW5fH89Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E0AAF65C3@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
	<5399828D02000078000B63B7@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<CABoYbGpm_Mfa+t=mZn=GAsGrJKtptydZ9T1Q9Vj-pKHtOY9i7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E0AAF9ABB@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
	<539EC228020000780001A7FC@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<CABoYbGpgMpvGSw38ijKxVW7m9FmD-FssQe-_hQ9g+xS5W2jr=Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E0AAFC869@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
	<CABoYbGpQRKYrp5rEE=rGbs=Xrvbvt4B33QDV9mSHx-GBstWK-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E0AAFF48C@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
	<53A40A2F020000780001BE2C@mail.emea.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <53A40A2F020000780001BE2C@mail.emea.novell.com>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Matthias <matthias.kannenberg@googlemail.com>, "tim@xen.org" <tim@xen.org>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Jan Beulich wrote on 2014-06-20:
>>>> On 19.06.14 at 14:25, <yang.z.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
>> Please try the attached debug patch and post the xl dmesg log. This
>> patch is based on 077fc1c0. It is working in my box which is an
>> Intel platform. But I am not sure whether it is working in your
>> side. If not, please
> let me know.
> 
> How could you ever expect EPT debugging code to work sensibly in AMD
> IOMMU code? The two exclude one another...

Yes, you are right. I didn't look into NPT spec. My gut feeling is that the page table format in EPT and NPT should same. But obviously, I am wrong.

> 
> Jan


Best regards,
Yang