From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tian, Kevin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] VT-d flush issue Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 06:21:38 +0000 Message-ID: References: <945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28894B7FBC68@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <5677F4B502000078000C1D51@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28894B7FC2D8@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <5678039102000078000C1DEA@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28894B7FC546@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <56780B3D02000078000C1E47@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <5679114D02000078000C219D@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28894B7FCEAF@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <5679177202000078000C21ED@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28894B7FD003@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <5679212D02000078000C2265@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28894B7FD1B7@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28894B7FD1B7@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "Xu, Quan" , Jan Beulich Cc: "'keir@xen.org'" , "'george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com'" , "'andrew.cooper3@citrix.com'" , "'tim@xen.org'" , "'xen-devel@lists.xen.org'" , "Nakajima, Jun" , "Wu, Feng" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > From: Xu, Quan > Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 6:26 PM > > > On 22.12.2015 at 5:09pm, wrote: > > >>> On 22.12.15 at 09:43, wrote: > > > Let's finish our discussion. I accept your idea. But I need to > > > separate it into 3 patch set (It is complicated for me, sometime it makes me > > crash.): > > > Patch set 1: Device-TLB/iotlb flush error. (send out this week) > > > Patch set 2: context flush error. (need 2 ~ 3 weeks) > > > Patch set 3: iec flush error. (need 3 ~ 4 weeks) > > > > > > If it is acceptable, we can discuss in detail one by one.. > > > > Splitting up is of course acceptable. > > Jan, > Just update the combination, > > Patch set 1: Device-TLB flush error. (send out this week) > Patch set 2: context/iotlb flush error. (need 2 ~ 3 weeks) > Patch set 3: iec flush error. (need 3 ~ 4 weeks) > > -Quan Sorry being late to this discussion. Thanks Jan/Andrew's comments for overall gap in VT-d error handling. Intel is definitely committed to continue improve current code quality, but let's do things one-by-one. Above is a good split. Let's start from there. Thanks Kevin