All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Williams, Mitch A <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH] i40evf: properly handle VLAN features
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:32:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AAEA33E297BCAC4B9BB20A7C2DF0AB8D7856CBC9@FMSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UecOja5TgA365Zo_rayZ7-oh7rNvZ2trbTyW87Oh7gMZA@mail.gmail.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Duyck [mailto:alexander.duyck at gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 1:50 PM
> To: Williams, Mitch A <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH] i40evf: properly handle VLAN
> features
> 
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Mitch Williams
> <mitch.a.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> > Correctly set the VLAN feature flags after setting the rest of the
> > netdev flags. And don't set them in hw_features, because these can't be
> > controlled by the VF driver.
> >
> > Testing Hints: Make sure VLAN offloads work correctly when not using
> > port VLANs, and make sure they're not availble when using port VLANs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c | 21 +++++++++++---------
> -
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c
> > index 4b70aae..039bbd2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c
> > @@ -2259,6 +2259,10 @@ static int i40evf_change_mtu(struct net_device
> *netdev, int new_mtu)
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +#define I40EVF_VLAN_FEATURES (NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX |\
> > +                              NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |\
> > +                              NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER)
> > +
> >  static const struct net_device_ops i40evf_netdev_ops = {
> >         .ndo_open               = i40evf_open,
> >         .ndo_stop               = i40evf_close,
> > @@ -2320,16 +2324,6 @@ int i40evf_process_config(struct i40evf_adapter
> *adapter)
> >                 return -ENODEV;
> >         }
> >
> > -       if (adapter->vf_res->vf_offload_flags
> > -           & I40E_VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_VLAN) {
> > -               netdev->vlan_features = netdev->features &
> > -                                       ~(NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX |
> > -                                         NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
> > -                                         NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER);
> > -               netdev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX |
> > -                                   NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
> > -                                   NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER;
> > -       }
> >         netdev->features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA |
> >                             NETIF_F_SG |
> >                             NETIF_F_IP_CSUM |
> > @@ -2358,6 +2352,13 @@ int i40evf_process_config(struct i40evf_adapter
> *adapter)
> >         /* copy netdev features into list of user selectable features */
> >         netdev->hw_features |= netdev->features;
> 
> This line here is actually a bit problematic.  I found while working
> on NETIF_F_GSO_PARTIAL that we end up calling i40evf_process_config
> multiple times.  What ends up happening is that features end up
> bleeding through into hw_features.  Same thing if you try going the
> other way.  Your best bend ends up actually being to populate
> hw_enc_features and then feed that into features and hw_features.
> 
> >         netdev->hw_features &= ~NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
> 
> I never noticed before but why are you clearing the NETIF_F_RXCSUM
> flag?  That is a feature you control via software isn't it?  You could
> just ignore the results from the hardware.  Why lock this feature for
> a VF?
> 
> > +       netdev->hw_features &= ~(I40EVF_VLAN_FEATURES);
> 
> There is no need to mask hw_features if you never set it.  I assume
> this is needed to deal with the bleeding through issue I referenced
> above where you are writing hw_features from features.
> 
> > +       netdev->features &= ~(I40EVF_VLAN_FEATURES);
> > +
> > +       if (vfres->vf_offload_flags & I40E_VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_VLAN) {
> > +               netdev->vlan_features = netdev->features;
> > +               netdev->features |= I40EVF_VLAN_FEATURES;
> > +       }
> >
> >         adapter->vsi.id = adapter->vsi_res->vsi_id;
> 
> You can probably just set vlan_features always.  As far as I know the
> i40e/i40evf hardware doesn't penalize you if you have some extra data
> like a VLAN tag in the L2 header so TSO and checksums should all still
> work.
> 
> - Alex

This looks like it's causing build problems, so let's drop it and I'll respin. Again.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-01 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-31 17:35 [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH] i40evf: properly handle VLAN features Mitch Williams
2016-03-31 20:50 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-04-01 17:32   ` Williams, Mitch A [this message]
2016-04-01 20:06     ` Alexander Duyck
2016-04-01 20:52       ` Williams, Mitch A
2016-04-01 20:55         ` Alexander Duyck
2016-04-01 23:41           ` Jeff Kirsher
2016-04-01  5:17 ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-01 13:10 ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AAEA33E297BCAC4B9BB20A7C2DF0AB8D7856CBC9@FMSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=mitch.a.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.