From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43407 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PijLZ-0000m4-V0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 03:06:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PijLY-0003Wm-IG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 03:06:21 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:34707) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PijLY-0003WZ-E2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 03:06:20 -0500 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so2858249wwi.10 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:06:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: tamura.yoshiaki@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20110127182233.GB5228@redhat.com> References: <4D412CF0.30706@redhat.com> <20110127182233.GB5228@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:06:18 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull? From: Yoshiaki Tamura Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Kevin Wolf , Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel , Gerd Hoffmann , Paolo Bonzini 2011/1/28 Michael S. Tsirkin : > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:29:36AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Before creating rc1 we need to make sure that all patches for 0.14 have >> been reviewed and applied. >> >> Please reply to this message with a subject starting with "[PING 0.14]" >> and a link to patchwork, gmane, or whatnot; or "[PULL 0.14]" for tree >> pulls. =A0Also, I believe all patches meant for stable should also start >> having "[PATCH 0.14]", too. >> >> Myself I have only >> >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/88490 >> >> to ping. :) =A0It is in branch qemu-char-echo of >> git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git as well. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Paolo > > Have some pci fixes, should be ready by monday. > Also working on a vhost patch that I think we > need for 0.14 but only for qemu-kvm. I would like Kemari to be included for 0.14. Thanks to many valuable comments from various reviewers, it got better than ever, I believe. For those who may object, it wouldn't affect any functions including live migration unless one turns it on. Besides, it is a good application of live migration. By having merged, I would be able to focus on increasing functionality and optimization. Thanks, Yoshi