From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Baldomero Coll <baldo.ath9k@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:13:55 +0100
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Progress on Ath9k HT support on Adhoc mode
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=JV5PiqG4Q6xO2Q7+ThvtOZDvZ0APqBJ9iK_dh@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

>
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:49:02 -0600
> From: Xianghua Xiao <xiaoxianghua@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Progress on Ath9k HT support on Adhoc mode
> To: simon_alex at web.de
> Cc: ath9k-devel at lists.ath9k.org
> Message-ID:
>        <AANLkTi=DTzrGDa60wPBsAgqXDZ--wiJC9qKK3KTf8Dk6@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Will there be a new version of IBSS/HT patch in the near future?
> Thanks,
>

Can anyone  tell me which 802.11n features are used when the HT IBSS network
is configured with 20 MHz band with?
As far as I know, the frame aggregation (AMSDU, AMPDU) is not working yet
(either in HT40, or in HT20 mode). Obviously, HT20 does not use 40MHz
channel. When I configure my HT20 IBSS network using the Alex and Benoit's
path, I don't experience 802.11n performance, the throughput is even lower
than that achieved with legacy IBSS network. Should the MCS0-15 data rates
also be working in addition to the MIMO technology?

thanks,
Baldo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20110322/de7e8d9f/attachment.htm