From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:34112 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756655Ab0HEFo6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2010 01:44:58 -0400 Received: by yxg6 with SMTP id 6so2356077yxg.19 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 22:44:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <4C581BB6.7000303@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 22:44:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: V4L hg tree fails to compile against latest stable kernel 2.6.35 From: VDR User To: Douglas Schilling Landgraf Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , "mailing list: linux-media" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: > Hello Derek, > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab > wrote: >> Em 03-08-2010 03:44, VDR User escreveu: >>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:36 PM, VDR User wrote: >>>> Any idea when this will be fixed? >> >> It is up to Douglas to do the backport, but you can just use the latest >> git tree, where those patches are applied already at 2.6.35, at the >> branch staging/v2.6.36. > > I am already working to give a full update to hg tree. Sorry this problem. Hi Douglas, thanks for the update! I'll pass the word along to other users I know who are wondering as well but who don't use the mailing list. A little off topic but IIRC wasn't there some talk about writing new scripts to main keep hg more up-to-date? If so, was that ever started? Otherwise, my apologies if I'm not remembering correctly.