From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756158Ab0HYAqI (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:46:08 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.44.51]:39921 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754168Ab0HYAqF (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:46:05 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=D5kAAGIkqJPRodOIkaXricm4wOW/msmn3/VsVJV8mWsxEIzA304SE+RAKNArkqHqzp vpXfBUt71RQbZHxGxmsw== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100825093747.24085b28.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20100820185552.426ff12e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100820185816.1dbcd53a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100825092010.cfe91b1a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100825093747.24085b28.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:46:03 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cgroup: ID notification call back From: Paul Menage To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" , "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , gthelen@google.com, m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , kamezawa.hiroyuki@gmail.com, "lizf@cn.fujitsu.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > Ou...I'm sorry but I would like to use attach_id() for this time. > Forgive me, above seems a big change. > I'd like to write a series of patch to do above, later. > At least, to do a trial. > Sure, for testing outside the tree. I don't think introducing new code into mainline that's intentionally ugly and cutting corners is a good idea. Paul From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C976B01F0 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:42:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from kpbe15.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe15.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.79]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o7P0k59Y015921 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:46:05 -0700 Received: from pwi10 (pwi10.prod.google.com [10.241.219.10]) by kpbe15.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o7P0k3i2023925 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:46:03 -0700 Received: by pwi10 with SMTP id 10so91361pwi.4 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:46:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100825093747.24085b28.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20100820185552.426ff12e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100820185816.1dbcd53a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100825092010.cfe91b1a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100825093747.24085b28.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:46:03 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cgroup: ID notification call back From: Paul Menage Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" , "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , gthelen@google.com, m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , kamezawa.hiroyuki@gmail.com, "lizf@cn.fujitsu.com" List-ID: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > Ou...I'm sorry but I would like to use attach_id() for this time. > Forgive me, above seems a big change. > I'd like to write a series of patch to do above, later. > At least, to do a trial. > Sure, for testing outside the tree. I don't think introducing new code into mainline that's intentionally ugly and cutting corners is a good idea. Paul -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org