From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Chua Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] ACPI: Fixes and cleanups related to iomaps management Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 01:24:32 +0800 Message-ID: References: <201101201226.41021.rjw@sisk.pl> <201101221025.49327.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:48454 "EHLO mail-iw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752022Ab1AVRYd convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:24:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201101221025.49327.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Len Brown , LKML , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux-pm mailing list , Matthew Garrett 2011/1/22 Rafael J. Wysocki : > On Saturday, January 22, 2011, Jeff Chua wrote: > means that my patch [11/11] _and_ the replacement are totally wrong, = because you have > _multiple_ NVS regions. =A0That really helped, thanks a lot. Would it be different if I offline all CPUs before suspending to ram? It seems to help with suspending to disk. Thanks, Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752668Ab1AVRYf (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:24:35 -0500 Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:48454 "EHLO mail-iw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752022Ab1AVRYd convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:24:33 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=g1wovsFOqVWPM8KOyW1HdyBGJHdEXTDGcFam7uG1xpgpBSJ6sUoEyH05SwEuWB4xS1 mttXmw4mBu6g9ajshQw5AU6JqcIsrxec4DxKqmzjvaL7LdBBMsxV9wbQaqzH2MRC0vWw M5PdntOpGlXYfMsWpN9pAZ2str+esijBBU+/E= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201101221025.49327.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <201101201226.41021.rjw@sisk.pl> <201101221025.49327.rjw@sisk.pl> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 01:24:32 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] ACPI: Fixes and cleanups related to iomaps management From: Jeff Chua To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Len Brown , LKML , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux-pm mailing list , Matthew Garrett Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2011/1/22 Rafael J. Wysocki : > On Saturday, January 22, 2011, Jeff Chua wrote: > means that my patch [11/11] _and_ the replacement are totally wrong, because you have > _multiple_ NVS regions.  That really helped, thanks a lot. Would it be different if I offline all CPUs before suspending to ram? It seems to help with suspending to disk. Thanks, Jeff