From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-gw0-f66.google.com ([74.125.83.66]:60024 "EHLO
	mail-gw0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S933450Ab0HEPHE convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-media@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:07:04 -0400
Received: by gwb11 with SMTP id 11so1168281gwb.1
        for <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 08:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=KQPhNgYvCbwNaOqW+k73uYcfaHYAj_N2Yvmvn@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=-ai2mZHiEmiEpKq9A-CifSPQDagrE03gDqpHv@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikZD32LC12bT9wPBQ5+uO3Msd8Sw5Cwkq5y3bkB@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C581BB6.7000303@redhat.com>
	<AANLkTi=i57wxwOEEEm4dXydpmePrhS11MYqVCW+nz=XB@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=KQPhNgYvCbwNaOqW+k73uYcfaHYAj_N2Yvmvn@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:07:00 -0300
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=Nq-+WmGdTFfqxrOKD9sNrnEhqh5=f2ubEukLg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: V4L hg tree fails to compile against latest stable kernel 2.6.35
From: Douglas Schilling Landgraf <dougsland@gmail.com>
To: VDR User <user.vdr@gmail.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>,
	"mailing list: linux-media" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-media.vger.kernel.org>

Hello,

On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:44 AM, VDR User <user.vdr@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf
> <dougsland@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello Derek,
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>> <mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Em 03-08-2010 03:44, VDR User escreveu:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:36 PM, VDR User <user.vdr@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Any idea when this will be fixed?
>>>
>>> It is up to Douglas to do the backport, but you can just use the latest
>>> git tree, where those patches are applied already at 2.6.35, at the
>>> branch staging/v2.6.36.
>>
>> I am already working to give a full update to hg tree. Sorry this problem.
>
> Hi Douglas, thanks for the update!  I'll pass the word along to other
> users I know who are wondering as well but who don't use the mailing
> list.
>
> A little off topic but IIRC wasn't there some talk about writing new
> scripts to main keep hg more up-to-date?  If so, was that ever
> started?  Otherwise, my apologies if I'm not remembering correctly.

We have a script to check if hg is synced to git tree, to extract
sequence of patches
from git tree, etc.. but not like this yet. Some time ago I and Mauro
discussed about create a script
to apply patches automatically (of course, those witch doesn't break
and need a backport manually) but I think it will
became true with this new git tree schema that Mauro implemented a few
days ago which reduces the number of branches
to follow.

Cheers
Douglas