From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.214.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pf6a3-0008Ei-9N; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:06:19 +0100 Received: by bwz10 with SMTP id 10so3039478bwz.6 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:05:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QyFDoMR1bhFB3Aepg8GGPE8xVT3rA23kFq+x9m88V5Y=; b=QU/hRxdUxw+Wpk6mYZHP5fJ/Te9ufR5Sp8ap21tJi+va7fHIlyJv87moYX4AWa+InE X1GRWY/tC07mDK3XqCI6yGAV1/he+esTfBd65yL7WB7Q/qkiRRd8bYNOPHmCYDyobKXL IS42Z1hLSScWo16UlwgvfQyX6+MlHdC1U4nKo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=cyenpfzMhcajHZjDOvUKO183xguEYoWWA3gqxgb+7p6ycFrbzcz9ilqOgiwSfr0wgV nMDAQEnfEvf5T1lPx77f2WfXXM3ip4VffyVCI/yK/fxRGM56Dx80ilNrw68OgkaW0QNI wMgxeHU+CepCZHxlo6Wq/GgzHh/QGriqatp1U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.119.133 with SMTP id z5mr3059429bkq.72.1295337941083; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:05:41 -0800 (PST) Sender: otavio.salvador@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.59.147 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:05:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D353F81.50301@xora.org.uk> References: <1295027350.14388.6527.camel@rex> <4D353F81.50301@xora.org.uk> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 06:05:41 -0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -1hTa6ENOe-1LSG5iCMu12LogWw Message-ID: From: Otavio Salvador To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Cc: openembedded-members@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Yocto Project and OE - Where now? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:06:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 05:21, Graeme Gregory wrote: > On 17/01/2011 19:01, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> - where possible stick to one recipe per package. This reduces the >> maintenance work and reduces the QA nightmare of lots of different >> permutations. >> I feel one recipe per package should be the common case for >> applications, and preferably also for libs (although I am well aware >> that especially in the latter case multiple versions cannot always be >> avoided). > > OE is not a distro so this is a non starter already, please don't bog > down this discussion by re-opening this again. Angstrom 2008, Angstrom > 2010, kaelios and slugos are all released distributions with different > versions of apps just as a starter and they arent even near the total > number of distros in OE. I disagree. I think having too many versions of a package just makes difficult to get things done: - it increases the amount of maintainence work; - has a bigger time to get bugs spoted; Users of old distros ought to use a specific repository and branch. Master ought to be kept clean for 'next distro release'. My 2c. --=20 Otavio Salvador=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0O= .S. Systems E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br=A0 http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://projetos.ossys= tems.com.br