From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40145 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PCzcj-0007cc-A3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:00:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PCzcf-0008AL-0T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:00:53 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.212.45]:55779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PCzce-0008AA-Tm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:00:48 -0400 Received: by vws4 with SMTP id 4so4172164vws.4 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:00:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9D1D39AB-C25C-40EB-AFE3-41122A681D4F@suse.de> References: <1288623713-28062-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1288623713-28062-9-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <4CCEE053.9020906@codemonkey.ws> <9D1D39AB-C25C-40EB-AFE3-41122A681D4F@suse.de> From: Blue Swirl Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 19:00:28 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/40] xenner: kernel: 64-bit files Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: qemu-devel Developers , Gerd Hoffmann On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 01.11.2010, at 11:44, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> On 11/01/2010 10:01 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> This patch adds various header files required for the xenner kernel on = 64 bit >>> systems. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf >>> >> >> I think it might make more sense to put this on a separate git.qemu.org = repository and then use a submodule in roms/. > > The main reason why I wanted to have it fully in the qemu tree is so that= we can guarantee the qemu<->xenner interface is 100% private. I'm not sure= how much it'll be in a flux, but I don't want to go through the hassle of = defining stable ABIs where we don't have to :) How is this different from SeaBIOS or OpenBIOS, both use fw_cfg interface? Also, after the ABI has stabilized (in the future), will you detach xenner from QEMU tree since this argument is no longer valid?