From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yoshiaki Tamura Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 19/19] migration: add a parser to accept FT migration incoming mode. Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:32:07 +0900 Message-ID: References: <1296199312-26334-1-git-send-email-tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp> <1296199312-26334-20-git-send-email-tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp> <4D42BD7D.8020004@redhat.com> <4D42D601.9010905@redhat.com> <4D42DC5E.8060203@redhat.com> <4D42E37B.9010207@redhat.com> <4D43EF43.8040001@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, dlaor@redhat.com, ananth@in.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, blauwirbel@gmail.com, ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp, avi@redhat.com, psuriset@linux.vnet.ibm.com, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:53615 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751540Ab1A2LcJ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jan 2011 06:32:09 -0500 Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so4057494wyb.19 for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 03:32:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D43EF43.8040001@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2011/1/29 Paolo Bonzini : > On 01/29/2011 10:31 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: >> >> OK, then while keeping "-incoming kemari:tcp::" as a >> strong solution, could you please explain why placing the original >> parser under tcp handler wasn't a good idea? =A0With that, >> -incoming exec .*,ft_mode shouldn't be a problem. > > But a hypothetical -incoming unix.*,ft_mode would have to be implemen= ted > twice. You mean Kemari should be able to use with unix domain sockets, or other local communication patch? Since Kemari needs two remote hosts, I don't see why need to use unix domain sockets except for testing. Maybe I'm missing the point :) Yoshi > > Paolo > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at =A0http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37222 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pj92I-00012m-IT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 06:32:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pj92H-0008A2-6z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 06:32:10 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:61488) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pj92G-00089t-T3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 06:32:09 -0500 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so3960329wwi.10 for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 03:32:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: tamura.yoshiaki@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <4D43EF43.8040001@redhat.com> References: <1296199312-26334-1-git-send-email-tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp> <1296199312-26334-20-git-send-email-tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp> <4D42BD7D.8020004@redhat.com> <4D42D601.9010905@redhat.com> <4D42DC5E.8060203@redhat.com> <4D42E37B.9010207@redhat.com> <4D43EF43.8040001@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:32:07 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 19/19] migration: add a parser to accept FT migration incoming mode. From: Yoshiaki Tamura Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, ananth@in.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, dlaor@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, blauwirbel@gmail.com, ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp, avi@redhat.com, psuriset@linux.vnet.ibm.com, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2011/1/29 Paolo Bonzini : > On 01/29/2011 10:31 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: >> >> OK, then while keeping "-incoming kemari:tcp::" as a >> strong solution, could you please explain why placing the original >> parser under tcp handler wasn't a good idea? =A0With that, >> -incoming exec .*,ft_mode shouldn't be a problem. > > But a hypothetical -incoming unix.*,ft_mode would have to be implemented > twice. You mean Kemari should be able to use with unix domain sockets, or other local communication patch? Since Kemari needs two remote hosts, I don't see why need to use unix domain sockets except for testing. Maybe I'm missing the point :) Yoshi > > Paolo > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at =A0http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >