From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Nexus One Support Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 13:18:54 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1295555565-21563-1-git-send-email-dwalker@codeaurora.org> <1295571359.9236.53.camel@m0nster> <1295574085.4096.6.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295575123.9236.54.camel@m0nster> <1295576730.4096.24.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295624801.19880.13.camel@m0nster> <20110121094827.41818a55@jbarnes-desktop> <20110121095658.1ab623fe@jbarnes-desktop> <1295632828.19880.22.camel@m0nster> <20110121100441.06a94482@jbarnes-desktop> <1295633882.19880.31.camel@m0nster> <1295642995.19880.42.camel@m0nster> <1295643762.25868.31.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295645098.22882.1.camel@m0nster> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:64819 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751820Ab1AVLSz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 06:18:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1295645098.22882.1.camel@m0nster> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Walker Cc: Joe Perches , Dima Zavin , Jesse Barnes , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidb@codeaurora.org Hi Daniel, On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 13:02 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 12:49 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote: >> > On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 12:44 -0800, Dima Zavin wrote: >> > > Really though? Let's look at one of them: >> > > =A0 =A0 =A0 2 Arve Hj=F8nnev=E5g >> > > =A0 =A0 =A0 6 Brian Swetland >> > > =A0 =A0 =A014 Dima Zavin >> > > =A0 =A0 =A0 2 Haley Teng >> > > =A0 =A0 =A0 1 Iliyan Malchev >> > > =A0 =A0 =A0 5 Mike Chan >> > I'll add this list into the commit text .. >> >> I think it'd be better if you pull them into a >> git repository, then use either: >> =A0 =A0 =A0 git format-patch >> =A0 =A0 =A0 git send-email >> or >> =A0 =A0 =A0 git request-pull >> >> That way no author history is lost. > > The history isn't upstreamable .. Why is that? I don't see any technical problem of upstreaming the original patches even if they don't compile (as long as they're not included in Makefiles or Kconfig files). There's no need to hide the real history even if it looks ugly... Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752556Ab1AVLS4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 06:18:56 -0500 Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:64819 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751820Ab1AVLSz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 06:18:55 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Rig+wEXmJcmKt68P+8+HbIj7I3k+JET4g3kyNqNiQITuD+V05I99jghlEupMYdYCeg iQ3qj0V+4yHkVa/O0fEP2E9hzDuCttXgIvO0lBeE/Cz4Et7/Clb+OBfFto5TfgOEYaXN JqOew9tmjVYSs5M+uS/TPU6aFET+dCtUeRClk= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1295645098.22882.1.camel@m0nster> References: <1295555565-21563-1-git-send-email-dwalker@codeaurora.org> <1295571359.9236.53.camel@m0nster> <1295574085.4096.6.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295575123.9236.54.camel@m0nster> <1295576730.4096.24.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295624801.19880.13.camel@m0nster> <20110121094827.41818a55@jbarnes-desktop> <20110121095658.1ab623fe@jbarnes-desktop> <1295632828.19880.22.camel@m0nster> <20110121100441.06a94482@jbarnes-desktop> <1295633882.19880.31.camel@m0nster> <1295642995.19880.42.camel@m0nster> <1295643762.25868.31.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295645098.22882.1.camel@m0nster> Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 13:18:54 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qxMJaG-NLodHDTzk-JscVSL-VeU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Nexus One Support From: Pekka Enberg To: Daniel Walker Cc: Joe Perches , Dima Zavin , Jesse Barnes , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidb@codeaurora.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Daniel, On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 13:02 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 12:49 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote: >> > On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 12:44 -0800, Dima Zavin wrote: >> > > Really though? Let's look at one of them: >> > >       2 Arve Hjønnevåg >> > >       6 Brian Swetland >> > >      14 Dima Zavin >> > >       2 Haley Teng >> > >       1 Iliyan Malchev >> > >       5 Mike Chan >> > I'll add this list into the commit text .. >> >> I think it'd be better if you pull them into a >> git repository, then use either: >>       git format-patch >>       git send-email >> or >>       git request-pull >> >> That way no author history is lost. > > The history isn't upstreamable .. Why is that? I don't see any technical problem of upstreaming the original patches even if they don't compile (as long as they're not included in Makefiles or Kconfig files). There's no need to hide the real history even if it looks ugly... Pekka From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: penberg@kernel.org (Pekka Enberg) Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 13:18:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/7] Nexus One Support In-Reply-To: <1295645098.22882.1.camel@m0nster> References: <1295555565-21563-1-git-send-email-dwalker@codeaurora.org> <1295571359.9236.53.camel@m0nster> <1295574085.4096.6.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295575123.9236.54.camel@m0nster> <1295576730.4096.24.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295624801.19880.13.camel@m0nster> <20110121094827.41818a55@jbarnes-desktop> <20110121095658.1ab623fe@jbarnes-desktop> <1295632828.19880.22.camel@m0nster> <20110121100441.06a94482@jbarnes-desktop> <1295633882.19880.31.camel@m0nster> <1295642995.19880.42.camel@m0nster> <1295643762.25868.31.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295645098.22882.1.camel@m0nster> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Daniel, On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 13:02 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 12:49 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote: >> > On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 12:44 -0800, Dima Zavin wrote: >> > > Really though? Let's look at one of them: >> > > ? ? ? 2 Arve Hj?nnev?g >> > > ? ? ? 6 Brian Swetland >> > > ? ? ?14 Dima Zavin >> > > ? ? ? 2 Haley Teng >> > > ? ? ? 1 Iliyan Malchev >> > > ? ? ? 5 Mike Chan >> > I'll add this list into the commit text .. >> >> I think it'd be better if you pull them into a >> git repository, then use either: >> ? ? ? git format-patch >> ? ? ? git send-email >> or >> ? ? ? git request-pull >> >> That way no author history is lost. > > The history isn't upstreamable .. Why is that? I don't see any technical problem of upstreaming the original patches even if they don't compile (as long as they're not included in Makefiles or Kconfig files). There's no need to hide the real history even if it looks ugly... Pekka