From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-gy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.160.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJNWc-0001Ir-CI for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:44:59 +0100 Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so2651025gyf.6 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 01:43:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ViApx+V6TFR9FHOm2t8RPYKFg2iALZ2DKjL/JPn5bdI=; b=XOAE8CJ4DV50RspRzpK0MtxijnVHcsHCa5bt9MLhgDX1EPt5c052Fru6bBntfPi6tU Be+zLz1cVjObk93BVUWANN6qkKnPbZexcLqq34fBz4345cT0u0je6WS9TZlgfdsM3Bt0 Fbw63p7528CdiX1lSawd6QMRmSiSRZbYqwEoo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aG8KzHbe0wvu/XHDKMIT7lIWg9yUK9Mvue+veTKS4I2tk3e6M2AajVaGEP/CgSla4r cckRNyE0TZ+J577ZqkkvFMWaJFJ3xEalCtTj+U86gLwqhtRcRPaGgBAwO6QQGBHnCQ6b 1lzBzEDSmY2jsdjWQ3Z93MtTPbbZzs9c1WRqg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.226.7 with SMTP id iu7mr1378120icb.67.1290159825502; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 01:43:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.33.4 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 01:43:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101119091100.GJ15069@ibawizard.net> References: <20101119091100.GJ15069@ibawizard.net> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:43:45 +0100 Message-ID: From: Frans Meulenbroeks To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.160.175 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: fransmeulenbroeks@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: testing branch 2010-11-12 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:44:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/11/19 Petr =C5=A0tetiar : > Cliff Brake [2010-11-18 17:13:17]: > >> Last week's test run was a success with 38 combinations passing. =C2=A0T= hanks to >> all running tests: >> >> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/tag/?id=3Dtested_2010= -11-12 >> >> Due to the OE 2010.12 release effort, we are going to give the testing-n= ext >> effort a break for a couple weeks and ask people doing testing to focus = on >> the release-2010.12 branch that Khem is working on. > > Hi Cliff, > > it looks like, you've included my failed builds also :-) I don't know if = it's > intention, but I think, that only successful builds should be in the comm= it > message, right? Is it my mistake, to report failed builds on the Testing = page? > > I'm really sorry, that I can only report my build results without fixing = them, > but I don't have any spare time now... > > -- ynezz Failure should be reported as it is also an indicator of quality. That's why the remarks column is there. Preferably also indicate failure cause and tinderbox link. Frans