From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35414 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Om9sJ-00054k-Iu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:30:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Om9sH-0002hE-TU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:30:02 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:49824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Om9sH-0002fu-RN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:30:01 -0400 Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5so2066642qwh.4 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:30:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4C6D3260.8010103@redhat.com> References: <4C6A4291.1020105@redhat.com> <4C6A8CD8.2080701@codemonkey.ws> <4C6A94D0.2090201@redhat.com> <4C6D3260.8010103@redhat.com> From: Blue Swirl Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:29:40 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jes Sorensen Cc: Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho , qemu-devel On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote: > On 08/17/10 20:56, Blue Swirl wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote: >>> I think we are in full agreement here, I am really just worried that we >>> add additional procedures here that will slow down the real development. >> >> Either the braces rule in CODING_STYLE is downgraded to >> recommendation, or some kind of new order is introduced. Current >> situation is unfair. > > Just to be sure I follow, are you suggesting we relax all of the bracing > rule, or just the part about braces around single line statements? I'd > be happy to write up a patch for the latter. I'd rather not relax the rules but find a solution so that the rules work.