From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.214.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PgpMl-0000M8-S3 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 03:07:47 +0100 Received: by bwz10 with SMTP id 10so2850497bwz.6 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:05:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Hh7WplFCwpbg9b0Dsj9VVAP9JHjpiEpdfyxTJB2l+Nc=; b=FS43ebda9Gi6Hz3UbyoWSHRhTIBwdRtQPqGDEpbWr6d0+jmZJydWgdsB7WGHxLLRQm Ko960TJMIPyNCvKTaOqMDtS6Jviyp/TApqsrWIhA5zlb7TgnDI2vgFseIJC13JCPDUYA NiaPhdLEWSvUzIBTMlBNzsIUsAgAgJxlAPF00= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=J5qkmt7MEj0Q4I+9E1MOUs9VYkJMU3UPMPMh1Y7CUo546WfsVBjhLZXHEFU58qu/Lo HPcuqTRXjIghQAE83CgRzHv9zgDsMMm0W1Q2Np89F5p9X9IlQWs01fN7dxbdTRgH7bWS kxouhDf0Dt/2h9cZ8rvq5s2QlG87vAvXWiwUw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.129.83 with SMTP id n19mr2182967bks.207.1295748348773; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:05:48 -0800 (PST) Sender: otavio.salvador@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.59.147 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:05:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D3B200B.6000909@mentor.com> References: <1295027350.14388.6527.camel@rex> <4D353F81.50301@xora.org.uk> <4D35C5C3.60205@mentor.com> <4D35FC8B.1090404@mentor.com> <4D3B200B.6000909@mentor.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 00:05:46 -0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Xq7_yByEqTEdDQSqGYC9hMCMXn4 Message-ID: From: Otavio Salvador To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Yocto Project and OE - Where now? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 02:07:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 16:20, Tom Rini wrote: > On 01/19/2011 01:46 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> Wrt the GPLv2+ version. I suggest to reflect this in the name. >> E.g. you could have samba and samba-gplv2 (or perhaps samba-gplv2 and >> samba-gplv3). Then it immediately becomes obvious why there are two >> versions. > > Put me in the "no" camp here please, we have a LICENSE field for a reason= . +1 What we'd do for multi-license projects? foo-lgplv2-gplv2-mit-bsd.bb? grrr --=20 Otavio Salvador=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0O= .S. Systems E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br=A0 http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://projetos.ossys= tems.com.br