From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ww0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PpRrm-0003z9-EH for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:51:22 +0100 Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so589654wwi.24 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:50:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RHa03b8dTh/5nR0nH9GaWvKxgHRDnifjOL8geSFWUb8=; b=erVo2e9DKlbTMFbNKn9vKBxoj2ijaYnHLgcrzAlapFHXqkEVdx9kXBBiOwgTL4c0bF YlPppMId6ITiyD9E6uRXJQJNrZIVc8CVzdkWZEGMDwiGLx59kDvOskuImhVr9j5tHRj9 WIcaDTz6REOmgAp4H/F4r5Ew75Rgp3JBTFVJM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jYR0DAMIa4KuOJVpbdHcbTJpeyGmTaDmR4X5S/ikOUgvxDTh8RWSAtJzVrnA22O20+ wbZrAXsPhAwuXo0T+Rp4lmz7kK/DdyDkZNm4zROVo3upe3pXu+384YBy4wRgVTouCs1t kOZGYF4I/bKgUdXkKQbCPUdbewPGWTwkO/jzk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.3.200 with SMTP id 50mr1182723weh.34.1297803011385; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:50:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.254.137 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:50:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D5953C5.3080605@mentor.com> References: <4D51566B.9060603@mentor.com> <4D516F8B.4090703@gmail.com> <4D5953C5.3080605@mentor.com> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:50:10 -0500 Message-ID: From: Cliff Brake To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: OpenEmbedded 2011.3 Release: Request for targets! X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:51:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > qt4e-demo-image fails in both cases due to the image not being happy with > qt4-4.6.x and only 4.7.x (see my emails to the list the other week). qt 4.7.1 demo images built fine for me on the release branch. Does angstrom want to consider using 4.7.1 for the release? Does anyone still require 4.6.x? Thanks, Cliff -- ================= http://bec-systems.com