From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy Subject: Re: [PATCH 1.8.0] add: make "add -u" update full tree without pathspec Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 21:15:21 +0700 Message-ID: References: <1297045643-26697-1-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> <7vei6t4uwa.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vy6512rnb.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vk4gkk5pd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v1v2reywi.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Pipping , =?UTF-8?Q?SZEDER_G=C3=A1bor?= , Matthieu Moy , Jeff King To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 01 15:15:59 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PuQMo-00032A-P4 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:15:59 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753369Ab1CAOPx (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:15:53 -0500 Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:35718 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752908Ab1CAOPw (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:15:52 -0500 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so4694609wyg.19 for ; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 06:15:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=2cLHMmizfOyKw53nX63X+YSDJM7l5IAaj9NzMrWtSgw=; b=OmCS3cLkuyqXPoxKTO3/y8iuYMvLct3ckfWmsc6dN0FfRNoTDMo6eyCwdwnL1Un6mc JMR6U2fCSyXGWcc2q//jaBOFySSe2ol6XgbMsx+9SpqzdSen7kMzVKEziRB7WqWI9Edy eFZvLvNvPe+S/Er6aHyZQX7uCp8wJ8cRJL2Hs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=QIGWEqRI28lOtISspAfKUz/C0CWe8r7Ld6Guijk0MeyUMHQZeyWk/Z0wjFcmAuf0ed CQgVYQjzDZ/NRBZx1aGv6tVnRDTRgb56KC5iINaDueamAPepvJPiStnoCQfHQsRfQIQ1 sYyCumT79pEqryndTQSLClYX1BE9AHExbR5OE= Received: by 10.216.59.3 with SMTP id r3mr681498wec.28.1298988951143; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 06:15:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.239.5 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 06:15:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7v1v2reywi.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy writes: > >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> But how many people may be impacted this way? ... >> Or accept that evolution is painful and go with current plan, which I'm OK too. > > So even though you raised a concern on possible pains during the > migration, you think that the migration plan outlined would be the > least bad one? I only see two ways. The 'new command' approach only delays the transition until a later (user decided) point. There's no guarantee that I (user) would make a good decision to switch. Plus the outlined plan looks simpler. Yes, it seems better. -- Duy