All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Brad Boyer <flar@allandria.com>,
	"J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc] new stat*fs-like syscall?
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 19:28:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikWredB5kF3iPhxIyGlyTDBM0DoMzn_eSc6rd6x@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100707014437.GA1851@infradead.org>

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> I'm still waiting for Uli if he really insists on new syscall vectors
> for the same structure.  Using that one ST_VALID bit seems a lot easier
> to me.

Umm. Uli doesn't get to choose kernel system call conventions. It
matters not one whit whether he insists on new system calls or not,
it's not going to happen.

             Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-07  2:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-24 13:14 [rfc] new stat*fs-like syscall? Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 14:03 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-06-24 14:36   ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 14:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2010-06-24 14:18   ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-06-24 14:37     ` Andrew Lutomirski
2010-06-24 14:48       ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-06-25  3:50         ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 23:06   ` Andreas Dilger
2010-06-25  6:37     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-24 23:13 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-06-25  4:01   ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-25  4:33     ` Jeff Garzik
2010-06-25 17:47     ` Andreas Dilger
2010-06-25 17:52       ` Ulrich Drepper
2010-06-25 18:16         ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-25 18:45           ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-25 19:40             ` Ulrich Drepper
2010-06-25 19:40               ` Ulrich Drepper
2010-06-26  5:53 ` J. R. Okajima
2010-06-26  9:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-26 12:54     ` J. R. Okajima
2010-07-05 20:58       ` Brad Boyer
2010-07-05 23:31         ` J. R. Okajima
2010-07-06  0:45           ` Brad Boyer
2010-07-06 16:45             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-07  1:44               ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-07  2:28                 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2010-06-26 14:49     ` Ulrich Drepper
2010-06-26 10:13 ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTikWredB5kF3iPhxIyGlyTDBM0DoMzn_eSc6rd6x@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=flar@allandria.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.