Re: [000/474] 2.6.33.8-longterm review

[John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
> Yeah, I know what you are thinking, "What, 2.6.33, are you crazy?"
>
> I'd prefer it if you didn't answer that question...
>
> Anyway, yes, a .33 kernel release, strange isn't it.
>
> Turns out there are a lot of people "stuck" on the 2.6.33 kernel series
> for a variety of valid reasons, not the least being the Real Time
> patchset.  So, in the copious spare time I have, I've been trying to
> keep up with the patches that have been applied to the different
> longterm and stable kernel trees and have been queueing them up for .33
> as well.
>
> Here's the result of that.  A 474 patch series that is bigger than most
> people ever want to review, or see in their inboxes.  Because of that,
> it is ONLY being sent to the stable-review@kernel.org mailing list.  If
> you want to see the individual patches, look at the git tree of the
> patch queue, or look at that mailing list.
>
> So, if you are using .33, please give this patch a test and let me know
> if I've messed up anything (hint, I think I did, it's up to you to
> figure it out, consider it a test to see if anyone actually cares about
> this kernel version.)
>
> If I missed anything that I should have in here, please let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Saturday, March 19, 2011, 21:00:00 UTC.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>        kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/longterm-review/patch-2.6.33.8-rc1.gz
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>

There is no rc1, so I assume
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/longterm-review/patch-2.6.33.8.bz2
is correct?
Which git tree do I want to use?

Thanks
John Kacur