From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-iw0-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PhJJo-0006P1-D6 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:06:40 +0100 Received: by iwn8 with SMTP id 8so4283994iwn.6 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 02:05:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=g8MuSKwArZVmJko8R4fQE/oqDk3oL/FtevdWpKzKOyk=; b=nwOPx8qGzbL/kmJJaW6QoKqnux/DTZK7oFyV/1nGDLYFkvEY4ZtQhT2FUBWY8Ogakl OKOxvqNOZkvANk+roe1c2FC7AHLsS7sujxXPeic03rhz8M0CosOwhiGj2rr7PShTnFE4 FZ4eaJkK+UAlOdU4Tgrm4SzIgLgdGgmMhohY8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=U/54esU1TkuP+iCi7HBjyfZr90lcQJCOYE0xUuTWxT+4I25zzBtsyLeNubgm0PpG+K NSMU/GdjiLaiiJA+2790kOMEJoPYgpMPv/fOW0b3jlWYR54yeaychHuc5wDUwIzv1oRV 77E6bG6yzN7+TvQaip6NzISWq2SnwqomLvkoM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.37.12 with SMTP id v12mr4450947ibd.83.1295863153003; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:59:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.36.68 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:59:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1295834629-3974-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:59:12 +0100 Message-ID: From: Frans Meulenbroeks To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] angstrom-2010.x.conf: Prefer binutils 2.21 and uclibc-git X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:06:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2011/1/24 Koen Kooi : > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 24-01-11 10:15, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >> On 24-01-11 03:03, Khem Raj wrote: >>>>> * no need to pin older udev with uclibc/git either >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj >> >> NAK! binutils 2.21 introduces way too many problem at this moment, those >> need to get solved before switching to it. >> >>> hmmm. Too vague a statement. Do you have list of issues somewhere I can look at >>> it built the console-image x11-image images I tried and booted >>> console-image too. > > Try building anything that uses linux-omap-psp 2.6.32. You will run into > the secure mode problem. That one is relatively easy to solve, but it > needs to get solved *before* the switch, not after. > > But besided that, so a change needs to get RFC'd, tested and signed off > by the angstrom maintainers before it gets pushed. It's a toolchain > change and we take toolchains seriously. > > Waking up and seeing it applied without all that is *extremely* > insulting. So I reverted it. > Pushing distro changes without review is against the policy: >From http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Policy: * Distro config changes should be reviewed by the distro maintainers where known Reveting changes from others is also against the policy: http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Revert_Policy (and imho equally bad (or insulting if you prefer)) Do unto others as you would have them do unto you My two eurocents. Frans.