From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49227 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ON84f-00024F-VT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:31:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ON84e-0005r5-N6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:31:21 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.212.45]:57127) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ON84e-0005qU-Je for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:31:20 -0400 Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so1401768vws.4 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:31:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: camm@ualberta.ca In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:31:16 -0600 Message-ID: From: Cam Macdonell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Unusual physical address when using 64-bit BAR List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , Avi Kivity , "Michael S. Tsirkin" On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Cam Macdonell wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to use a 64-bit BAR for my shared memory device. =A0In simply > changing the memory type in pci_register_bar() to > PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 I get an unusual physical address for > that BAR (and my driver crashes in pci_ioremap). > > from lspci: > > 00:04.0 RAM memory: Qumranet, Inc. Device 1110 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Subsystem: Qumranet, Inc. Device 1100 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Flags: fast devsel, IRQ 10 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Memory at f1020000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=3D1K] > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Memory at f1021000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=3D4K] > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Memory at c20000000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=3D= 1024M] > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Capabilities: > 00: f4 1a 10 11 03 00 10 00 00 00 00 05 00 00 00 00 > 10: 00 00 02 f1 00 10 02 f1 04 00 00 00 00 c2 00 00 > 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f4 1a 00 11 > 30: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0b 01 00 00 > > with DEBUG_MEMREG, I see > > kvm_unregister_memory_area:666 Unregistering memory region > c20000000000 (40000000) > kvm_destroy_phys_mem:649 slot 7 start c20000000000 len 0 flags 0 > IVSHMEM: addr =3D 3221225472 size =3D 1073741824 > kvm_register_phys_mem:605 memory: gpa: c200c0000000, size: 40000000, > uaddr: 7f6dd7ffe000, slot: 7, flags: 0 > kvm_unregister_memory_area:666 Unregistering memory region > c200c0000000 (40000000) > kvm_destroy_phys_mem:649 slot 7 start c200c0000000 len 0 flags 0 > IVSHMEM: addr =3D 0 size =3D 1073741824 > kvm_register_phys_mem:605 memory: gpa: c20000000000, size: 40000000, > uaddr: 7f6dd7ffe000, slot: 7, flags: 0 > kvm_unregister_memory_area:666 Unregistering memory region > c20000000000 (40000000) > kvm_destroy_phys_mem:649 slot 7 start c20000000000 len 0 flags 0 > IVSHMEM: addr =3D 0 size =3D 1073741824 > kvm_register_phys_mem:605 memory: gpa: ffffffff00000000, size: > 40000000, uaddr: 7f6dd7ffe000, slot: 7, flags: 0 > kvm_unregister_memory_area:666 Unregistering memory region > ffffffff00000000 (40000000) > kvm_destroy_phys_mem:649 slot 7 start ffffffff00000000 len 0 flags 0 > IVSHMEM: addr =3D 0 size =3D 1073741824 > kvm_register_phys_mem:605 memory: gpa: c20000000000, size: 40000000, > uaddr: 7f6dd7ffe000, slot: 7, flags: 0 > > (the IVSHMEM lines are my debug statements) > > address sizes =A0 : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual =A0(guest) > address sizes =A0 : 38 bits physical, 48 bits virtual =A0(host) > Hi, I happened to run into this problem again when trying to use a 64-bit BAR. I did a bit more digging and the test that is failing is called from arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c in the guest and here it is. static inline int phys_addr_valid(resource_size_t addr) { #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT return !(addr >> boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits); #else return 1; #endif } the value of addr (in this case the 48-bit virtual address c20000000000) is shifted to the right shift by boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits (which is 40 bits, the physical address size), so a non-zero value is returned which causes the test to fail and generates the "invalid physical address" error in the guest. Any help is appreciated as to whether this is a Qemu or guest kernel issue. Thanks, Cam