Re: [PATCH 2/2] ALSA: HDA: Add a new model "asus" for Conexant 5066/205xx

[Andy Robinson <ajr55555@gmail.com>]

Certainly, I should be able test it sometime later today. I'll let you
know the results.

I'm wondering how common this configuration is on Asus systems - that
is, if the asus model should be the rule for Asus rather than the
exception for a few specific ones. When I have some free time, maybe
I'll delve into the alsa-info database to see what's been reported
there. I suppose it could also be handled generically by checking to
see if mics are on nodes 0x1a, 0x1b, 0x1c, 0x1d, and/or 0x23, and
automatically selecting the correct automic logic based on that.

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:43 AM, David Henningsson
<david.henningsson@canonical.com> wrote:
> On 2011-01-24 13:52, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>
>> At Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:12:39 +0100,
>> David Henningsson wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2011-01-22 17:31, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>>>
>>>> At Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:46:00 +0100,
>>>> David Henningsson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/701271
>>>>>
>>>>> This new model, named "asus", is identical to the "hp_laptop" model,
>>>>> except for the location of the internal mic, which is at pin 0x1a.
>>>>> It is used for Asus K52JU and Lenovo G560.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: David Henningsson<david.henningsson@canonical.com>
>>>>
>>>> Applied, but to topic/asoc branch, as these involve rewrites.
>>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> You mean the topic/hda branch, right?
>>
>> Argh, yes, of course...
>>
>>> Does this mean it'll not be in 2.6.38, and will it be if I provide a
>>> backport for the second patch?
>>
>> Right.
>
> Ok, here's a backport, although untested since I don't have the hardware
> here. Andy, would it be possible for you to test it for me?
>
> --
> David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
> http://launchpad.net/~diwic
>