From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753734Ab0FYI0S (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:26:18 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.156]:34569 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751755Ab0FYI0Q convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:26:16 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Aa1nsAUdPOEe11MkqX+5GrsNvTTCziFTuafClStvjtgMtdB32ubaYQjUTZ5lp9J00y 3bLDoL4S0nMvM9oB+tDQ6Q1k9ahuIRAjYTKiottpBOQ1BqaiCSXvyMq7VQCj6F20NxIl MG8VWYDeCNi5AhTM/vn4/5gJ0loRvoQ6cXAWY= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4C23FF28.4040404@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <4C2312A8.9060903@jp.fujitsu.com> <4C23FF28.4040404@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:57:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] napi: convert trace_napi_poll to TRACE_EVENT From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Koki Sanagi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, KOSAKI Motohiro Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2010/6/25 Koki Sanagi : > This patch converts trace_napi_poll from DECLARE_EVENT to TRACE_EVENT. >>From DECLARE_TRACE to TRACE_EVENT. Or more generally: this expands the napi polling tracepoint to a trace event, to improve the napi polling tracepoint usability. > This lets you know how long napi_poll takes. > >          -0     [001] 241302.750777: napi_poll: napi poll on napi struct f6acc480 for device eth3 >          -0     [000] 241302.852389: napi_poll: napi poll on napi struct f5d0d70c for device eth1 >          -0     [000] 241302.852389: napi_poll: napi poll on napi struct f5d0d20c for device eth1 > > This is a same patch Neil Horman submitted. > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125978157926853&w=2 Hmm, nope, doesn't seem to be the same patch.