From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754719Ab0FMT6F (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:58:05 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:51391 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754656Ab0FMT6B convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:58:01 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <201006131722.44062.s.L-H@gmx.de> From: Grant Likely Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:57:40 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: tDMCJfIHKCtfQkGL-kOCFq2bmuM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 To: Christian Kujau Cc: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Michael Ellerman , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: >> Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue >> for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week: > > So, now we have two patches for slightly different issues? > > * http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html >  ...fixes the flexcop-pci.c driver. > > * http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ >  ...fixes "some bogus firmwares include properties with "/" in their >  name". I'm not sure if this would make the flexcop-pci.c badness go >  away too. > > Anyway, both patches are not upstream yet, but Michael mentioned that > Grant Likely or Ben might push it eventually. On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue. I'll pick up the device tree patch, but the flexcop-pci patch should go in by the v4l/dvb tree. g. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:57:40 -0600 Message-ID: References: <201006131722.44062.s.L-H@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Christian Kujau Cc: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Michael Ellerman , linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: >> Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the= issue >> for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week: > > So, now we have two patches for slightly different issues? > > * http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html > =A0...fixes the flexcop-pci.c driver. > > * http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ > =A0...fixes "some bogus firmwares include properties with "/" in thei= r > =A0name". I'm not sure if this would make the flexcop-pci.c badness g= o > =A0away too. > > Anyway, both patches are not upstream yet, but Michael mentioned that > Grant Likely or Ben might push it eventually. On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue. I'll pick up the device tree patch, but the flexcop-pci patch should go in by the v4l/dvb tree. g.