From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arve_Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 03:23:32 -0700 Message-ID: References: <201008071044.37486.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: david@lang.hm, peterz@infradead.org, swetland@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, florian@mickler.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , tglx@linutronix.de, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Arjan van de Ven List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org 2010/8/7 Arve Hj=F8nnev=E5g : > 2010/8/7 Rafael J. Wysocki : >> On Saturday, August 07, 2010, Arve Hj=F8nnev=E5g wrote: >>> 2010/8/6 Alan Stern : >>> > On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Arve Hj=F8nnev=E5g wrote: ... >>> >> total_time, total time the wake lock has been active. This one should >>> >> be obvious. >>> > >>> > Also easily added. >>> > >>> Only with a handle passed to all the calls. >> >> Well, I'm kind of tired of this "my solution is the only acceptable one" >> mindset. =A0IMHO, it's totally counter productive. >> > > How do you propose to track how long a driver has blocked suspend when > you have an unblock call that takes no arguments. > Also, I did not not see a response to my question about why you don't want to pass a handle. -- = Arve Hj=F8nnev=E5g