From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cyrus@holtmann.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4D5BF2E1.6070102@codeaurora.org>
References: <1297891081-27976-1-git-send-email-bgix@codeaurora.org>
	<1297891081-27976-4-git-send-email-bgix@codeaurora.org>
	<AANLkTi=dwj0Bc_509JW8-HfkYBfzmfSzR0GJxNqoLXye@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D5BF2E1.6070102@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:38:42 -0300
Message-ID: <AANLkTimKxkbgCbc2RBDcumH=VUsiZ-qWJYwkpnQp-QLi@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add gatttool enhancements for UPF
From: Anderson Lizardo <anderson.lizardo@openbossa.org>
To: Brian Gix <bgix@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, johan.hedberg@nokia.com,
	padovan@profusion.mobi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Brian,

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Brian Gix <bgix@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Hi Anderson,
>
> The modifications to gatttool were largely organic in nature and on the fly
> responses to the needs of my UPF testing. Also, it is of course just a test
> tool.

Understood, but if you could split these changes into more "logic"
pieces (separate commits), with commit messages which explain the
reasoning of the change (e.g. the answers on this thread), it will be
nice.

Regards,
-- 
Anderson Lizardo
Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia - INdT
Manaus - Brazil