From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Menage Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] cgroup: add per cgroup timer_slack_ns Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 12:52:36 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1291230012-9536-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <1291230012-9536-2-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <20101202124559.0a7128de@jacob-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20101202124559.0a7128de@jacob-laptop> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: jacob pan Cc: Arjan van de Ven , container cgroup , LKML List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:45 PM, jacob pan wrote: > > I guess timer_slack_ns alone cannot qualify for a new subsystem, I think that it's providing a sufficiently different control from existing subsystems that making it a separate subsystem is reasonable. The cpuset subsystem definitely doesn't sound like the right place, since it's more dealing with numa isolation/policy. The cpu subsystem could be, since it also deals with scheduling stuff. Paul