From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932937Ab1CXOiH (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:38:07 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:48409 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754227Ab1CXOiF (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:38:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1300864998.3522.71.camel@thor.local> <1300868532.3522.81.camel@thor.local> <1300880747.16522.13.camel@thor.local> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:37:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [git pull] drm fixes To: Ilija Hadzic Cc: Dave Airlie , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michel_D=E4nzer?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, DRI mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Ilija Hadzic wrote: > > OK, I'll update libdrm side to match this change and send the patch later > today Quite frankly, this whole discussion is a clear example of why DRM has been problematic. Why the hell am I getting pushed stuff that is clearly not baked? It's the second week of the merge window, the stuff I'm getting should have been finalized two weeks ago, not be something that is still being discussed and that has API issues. In other words: Why should I pull this at all? Linus