From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-iw0-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PoyZi-0006jE-5W for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:34:46 +0100 Received: by iwn8 with SMTP id 8so4733816iwn.6 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 05:33:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nn5Elb/NgoFhqPynVKZHegwSry+T1mTdM/PAhTtxs9o=; b=QCt72xY0mZHpvUeFkTov7yh8rYpDSnYt3/r7+AAujTb5smWu3Vyy6QhL8VU9HADJtE ovXTCYF7GXmuxvBkys7yxlr5iz6W4yux+ORbEtr092PS8jqsz3HjSC4r5MnurWvxM2Zw I9RtHysp/cIx/lXsGdutgIHs8oqRPIGJsiyqY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=UXTr5ki5zR6Rh8sdmSdLMO0U+bspGBXb0ewWkt55AsulaFQQVHc2YgZMGPLM4O2eVu TEWjElCc5dNpXy8MMl3AGUhmXOD3paveM0QYIAoy2n1y4YqVyyGz3BmfYmPVDbmcvpJs SFnmnF/sgKM8ZQyyr6oDVA1UubGmPQWBFYyzw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.7.129 with SMTP id e1mr4820995ice.500.1297690413377; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 05:33:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.30.73 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 05:33:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110214094810.GE14931@excalibur.local> References: <20110214094810.GE14931@excalibur.local> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:33:33 +0100 Message-ID: From: Frans Meulenbroeks To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: TSC agenda items for the next meeting X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:34:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2011/2/14 Stefan Schmidt : > Hello. > > On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 11:50, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> The new TSC is holding a meeting next week and we wanted to see if >> anyone wants to suggest items we put in the agenda for the meeting. >> >> If you have such items, please let us know by replying to this mail. > > All items brought up here until now should be available in the final agenda now. > Please see the attchment for it. > > Sometimes items may cover parts of the same topic. I did not work them into one > to keep the original text of the submitters. Not sure if this is a good way to > deal with this overlaps. > > With 18 items this is a lot of topics and I'm not ure we can cover this all in > one meeting. We are aiming for weekly but shorter meetings to keep thins moving > and not pilling up to much. > > regards > Stefan Schmidt Stefan, thanks for making and sharing the list. If you feel crediting things is important you can add [Proposed: Frans] to #14. Personally I don't care, but I noticed it was done for all other items. Guess with such a list you need to pull an all-nighter. Good luck in discussing this and coming to wise decision Frans. PS: if I may coin an additional item: #0:a quick prioritization of the points.