From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48477 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PjB5j-0005sD-Ek for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 08:43:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PjB5i-0008Uv-5s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 08:43:51 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:42016) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PjB5i-0008UE-1U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 08:43:50 -0500 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so4021849wwi.10 for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:43:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: tamura.yoshiaki@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <4D42F378.7080604@codemonkey.ws> References: <4D412CF0.30706@redhat.com> <20110127182233.GB5228@redhat.com> <4D4293D6.2080802@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4D42C5B0.6000007@redhat.com> <4D42F378.7080604@codemonkey.ws> Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 22:43:49 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull? From: Yoshiaki Tamura Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Kevin Wolf , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel , Markus Armbruster , Gerd Hoffmann , Paolo Bonzini 2011/1/29 Anthony Liguori : > On 01/28/2011 07:33 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> On 01/28/2011 11:00 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: >>> >>> 28.01.2011 11:06, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: >>> [] >>>> >>>> I would like Kemari to be included for 0.14. =A0Thanks to many >>>> valuable comments from various reviewers, it got better than >>>> ever, I believe. =A0For those who may object, it wouldn't affect >>>> any functions including live migration unless one turns it on. >>>> Besides, it is a good application of live migration. =A0By having >>>> merged, I would be able to focus on increasing functionality and >>>> optimization. >>> >>> It's somewhat unexpected to see merge request for any new >>> functionality into a "stable" branch. =A0Having nothing bad >>> against Kemari, I still think we shouldn't include any new >>> functionality into 0.14, which were planned to be released >>> before new year... ;) >>> >>> I mean, if it were not merged so far, for reasons that can >>> be discussed separately etc, regardless of its good shape >>> and so on... let's don't do any last-minute merges. >> >> To be fair to Yoshiaki, the first 17 patches in his 19-patch series have >> no impact on the operation of QEMU, and even the last two are Kemari-onl= y. >> =A0I know almost nothing about Kemari so I cannot comment on the technic= al >> side of those patches, only that it w^Hshouldn't be destabilizing. =A0I = made >> some comments on a couple of patches, so I'm inclined to say no as well. > > No, I'd prefer not to take Kemari before the 0.14 freeze. =A0It gives us = a > full release cycle for testing plus gives a nice headline feature for 0.1= 5. Sounds reasonable to me. I thought it might be forgotten unless I didn't raise my voice :) I'll keep up the pace to get it in once the development cycle is ready. Thanks, Yoshi >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/91096 should be >> applied in any case, as it is a regression from 0.12. > > Thanks. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > > >> Paolo >> > > >