From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Poddar, Sourav" Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] ARM: bitops: switch set/clear/change bitops to use ldrex/strex Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:24:41 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20110117192050.GE23331@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110123001636.GA20841@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110123093526.GA26120@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110124102849.GA18459@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110124141112.GM16202@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog114.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.211]:36307 "EHLO na3sys009aog114.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751667Ab1AXOyn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:54:43 -0500 Received: by mail-wy0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 20so4803956wye.7 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 06:54:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110124141112.GM16202@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Nicolas Pitre , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 07:17:54PM +0530, Poddar, Sourav wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:27:24PM +0530, Poddar, Sourav wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Poddar, Sourav wrote: >> >> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:44:59PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> >> >>> At least another person did post results: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> http://mid.gmane.org/20110117094602.GA2622@pulham.picochip.co= m >> >> >>> http://mid.gmane.org/20110117110308.GC2622@pulham.picochip.co= m >> >> >> >> >> >> Slightly different patch - there were three revisions. =A0I ca= n't attach >> >> >> a tested-by given to a different patch to this one. >> >> >> >> >> >>> > That means omap2plus_defconfig .38 mainline kernels >> >> >>> > (including -stable) will remain potentially dangerous when = run on >> >> >>> > SMP capable hardware. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I must admit that this series looks a bit large for stable IM= HO. =A0I >> >> >>> think that the fix for stable should limit itself only to pre= vent SMP >> >> >>> from being selected if anything else than CPU_32v6K is select= ed. >> >> >> >> >> >> The first three are the bare minimum required for -stable. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> =A0Boot tested the 14 patch series =A0with CONFIG_SWP_EMULATE ena= bled, on >> >> =A0the following boards : >> >> >> >> >> >> =A0 1. Omap2420 SDP >> >> >> >> =A0 2. Omap2430 SDP >> >> >> >> =A0 3. Omap3430 SDP >> >> >> >> =A0 4. Omap4 Blaze >> >> >> >> =A0 Tested-by: Sourav Poddar >> > >> > Thanks. =A0It's also important to ascertain which filesystems were= tested - >> > could you let me know please? >> > >> >> It is a custom filesystem on BusyBox v1.17.2. > > So you wrote code under fs/ for this filesystem? No. >> Please let me know if you need some other >> information. > > I'm trying to find out what _type_ of filesystem. =A0ext2, ext3, nfs,= cramfs, > etc. > nfs filesystem. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sourav.poddar@ti.com (Poddar, Sourav) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:24:41 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 02/14] ARM: bitops: switch set/clear/change bitops to use ldrex/strex In-Reply-To: <20110124141112.GM16202@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110117192050.GE23331@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110123001636.GA20841@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110123093526.GA26120@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110124102849.GA18459@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110124141112.GM16202@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 07:17:54PM +0530, Poddar, Sourav wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:27:24PM +0530, Poddar, Sourav wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Poddar, Sourav wrote: >> >> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:44:59PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> >> >>> At least another person did post results: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> http://mid.gmane.org/20110117094602.GA2622 at pulham.picochip.com >> >> >>> http://mid.gmane.org/20110117110308.GC2622 at pulham.picochip.com >> >> >> >> >> >> Slightly different patch - there were three revisions. ?I can't attach >> >> >> a tested-by given to a different patch to this one. >> >> >> >> >> >>> > That means omap2plus_defconfig .38 mainline kernels >> >> >>> > (including -stable) will remain potentially dangerous when run on >> >> >>> > SMP capable hardware. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I must admit that this series looks a bit large for stable IMHO. ?I >> >> >>> think that the fix for stable should limit itself only to prevent SMP >> >> >>> from being selected if anything else than CPU_32v6K is selected. >> >> >> >> >> >> The first three are the bare minimum required for -stable. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> ?Boot tested the 14 patch series ?with CONFIG_SWP_EMULATE enabled, on >> >> ?the following boards : >> >> >> >> >> >> ? 1. Omap2420 SDP >> >> >> >> ? 2. Omap2430 SDP >> >> >> >> ? 3. Omap3430 SDP >> >> >> >> ? 4. Omap4 Blaze >> >> >> >> ? Tested-by: Sourav Poddar >> > >> > Thanks. ?It's also important to ascertain which filesystems were tested - >> > could you let me know please? >> > >> >> It is a custom filesystem on BusyBox v1.17.2. > > So you wrote code under fs/ for this filesystem? No. >> Please let me know if you need some other >> information. > > I'm trying to find out what _type_ of filesystem. ?ext2, ext3, nfs, cramfs, > etc. > nfs filesystem.