From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756247Ab0KVMsH (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2010 07:48:07 -0500 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.44.51]:24179 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756223Ab0KVMsE convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2010 07:48:04 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=eSGfQMNbL6fsAOo0KmC0I6i3OOQiv6sk77GGhxJt/PbvHmb2AEQccAMbDYS9SlFiFT iR2bsoa9brvh21YSut3Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1290077254-12165-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1290077254-12165-4-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:47:59 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf-events: Add support for supplementary event registers v3 From: Stephane Eranian To: Lin Ming Cc: Andi Kleen , a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Andi Kleen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Lin Ming wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: >> From: Andi Kleen >> >> Intel Nehalem/Westmere have a special OFFCORE_RESPONSE event >> that can be used to monitor any offcore accesses from a core. >> This is a very useful event for various tunings, and it's >> also needed to implement the generic LLC-* events correctly. >> >> Unfortunately this event requires programming a mask in a separate >> register. And worse this separate register is per core, not per >> CPU thread. > > This "separate register" is MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0, right? > But from the SDM,  MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0 is "thread" scope, > see SDM 3b, Appendix B.4 MSRS IN THE INTEL® MICROARCHITECTURE CODENAME NEHALEM > > Or am I missing some obvious thing? > The manual is wrong on this. > Thanks, > Lin Ming >