From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ohad Ben-Cohen Subject: Re: subtle pm_runtime_put_sync race and sdio functions Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 07:27:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Vitaly Wool Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Johannes Berg , Ido Yariv List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Vitaly Wool wrote: > you're talking about _complete_ shutdown as a suspended state for both > runtime PM and static PM, is that correct? Exactly. This is the power of the card as seen by the MMC/SDIO subsystem.