From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.213.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDkFK-0002MX-0g for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:47:50 +0100 Received: by ywo7 with SMTP id 7so299782ywo.6 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:46:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Z8twl9Bq2oDK45fHdXjukBdj+EhU1IWVTBDoP8Wb5HY=; b=ZfxIF0QdSPQjsxMOVirhKiESmIu9GrZs1mhaemyUnzd3WdQEzetZ0ERqTvR5ts/2xi QqDnP3RDwZ9WGUt+JOD50n0pj97UacRdwWl/DkTkjOTFiHf5EN4e80Sxp7ZCElWAGXHo NMBNd2jSj3QMyb8lTmZdjyu3gthB0uTFh4z1E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=O3sNli+ZNzUi0vLTS8ReqcXuAZCeGqq1TH94aTJFNfcNOYF7lqsmksezpi7r3UD1g9 Xcatru15gwdZme18mdqgq3BWvmEhNhqo0ed2R/RgmoeblXB/OHHQvcOfDJ1idAbxOl87 yz8UdrfZsbLl7GA8U3jVCDSQVvo6V8zAbfmjo= Received: by 10.90.57.2 with SMTP id f2mr30912aga.118.1288817217226; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:46:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.135.18 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:46:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CCF64DD.9080709@gmail.com> <20101103154735.GE3440@jama> From: Khem Raj Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:46:36 -0700 Message-ID: To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.213.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: raj.khem@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gphoto2_2.4.8.bb: Stop configure from looking in /usr/local/include X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:47:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/11/3 Khem Raj : >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks >> wrote: >>> 2010/11/3 Khem Raj : >>> >>>> >>>> yes a more detailed solution is better. you have to go through the >>>> configure of every >>>> package and understand the behavior then act upon. As I said before >>>> its a tedious task >>>> >>> I'm well aware of this. That is also why in the infrastructure thread >>> I suggested using automated testing to find misbehaving packages. >>> >>> Btw there are 355 .inc files that contain the word autotools and 1899 .bb files. >>> Of course there are lots of dups in there. >>> And maybe for the base recipes we can convince the yocto people that >>> this is a serious QA issue (and they have some people employed to work >>> on this if I understood properly). >>> >> >> numbers means not so much when it comes down to this. I don't know if >> any distribution that even does that >> so I take comfort in everyone being wrong. >> > > I agree that numbers don't mean that much. Just wanted to give an > indication of the possible effort needed. > Also no idea how debian does this. Does it do it in first place ? > One way to get a minimal package is to have everything in packaged > staging then bake the recipe. > that'll only drag in stuff from depends. It depends also on the sequence of staging. So there are multiple factors and no two stagings will look same > > Frans > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >