From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-iw0-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PlGW7-0003kO-BD for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 08:55:43 +0100 Received: by iwn8 with SMTP id 8so1935187iwn.6 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:54:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZjBOqCaFl/yDH0PcN6WG3uuSFsWUJCLJpNkvCrj8/F8=; b=oEU0pbNrkR7obR68KEvg3HJX1XATBiUs3Giz3SNxH0XmlS6VhttkpoVIVnPKlnFJOK 05oJUVZBe9T7sctf846pGsRvCC27vlT/NCHUXlomoD2ys8iNIMFAUeLdnAIjDIM+sGXt TI49T2Nf4V3raNNsMyvKQPhOs7cpMGi4NigcM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wg6dcTg5M9xtrXmA9px76Qwms1J1R0PzfKgJ7ZNyJJXU5ZjKfR0zSNmRdhfmDoKy5P t2AvuydoqWBZNF6Pty78EHKIJoq5jGK1YhdDGYVMY2z6toFW6KSFaIwwXyKzanMhkayF EUUf+XvyFCOodFqqG2y3IHoPZ1EX3wYj1JQ8Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.172.75 with SMTP id k11mr9500260ibz.133.1296806084770; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:54:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.36.68 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 23:54:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D4B35A7.4040000@mentor.com> References: <131E5DFBE7373E4C8D813795A6AA7F08032A16A440@dlee06.ent.ti.com> <131E5DFBE7373E4C8D813795A6AA7F08032A16A5BE@dlee06.ent.ti.com> <4D403D6F.3040800@mentor.com> <201101271038.18945.ml@vdm-design.de> <4D418914.2030703@mentor.com> <20110203070901.GA11867@denix.org> <4D4AE93E.2020509@mentor.com> <20110203222035.GA19477@denix.org> <4D4B35A7.4040000@mentor.com> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:54:44 +0100 Message-ID: From: Frans Meulenbroeks To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: bitbake does not fail when QA issues encountered X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 07:55:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2011/2/4 Tom Rini : > On 02/03/2011 03:20 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:43:26AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: >>> >>> On 02/03/2011 12:09 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:02:44AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 01/27/2011 04:27 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The problem is that today we have QA Errors that are warnings >>>>> (coreutils-native) and QA Errors that result in a non-zero exit code >>>>> but >>>>> also don't "kill the build" nor make it obvious at the end that there >>>>> is >>>>> a >>>>> non-zero exit code (GNU_HASH, RPATH). =A0Finally we do have "kill the >>>>> build" >>>>> fatal checks in insane.bbclass, namely the do_qa_configure tests. >>>> >>>> Actually, I believe there was a simple error in the code which made QA >>>> Error >>>> on RPATH not kill the build[1]. BTW, GNU_HASH QA Error does stop the >>>> build. >>>> >>>> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/42168 >>> >>> Good spotting. =A0But.. GNU_HASH QA error will give you a non-zero exit >>> code >>> and not kill the build so we're back where we started, albeit with a le= ss >>> often hit in the community trigger (but I bet more often hit in private= / >>> 3rd party collections). >> >> So, do you ack the patch, should I push it in? It will break the build f= or >> anyone still using libtool-2.2, specifically in gettext package... > > So, that would break angstrom-2008.1 so I don't think that's a great idea > until we fix it.. Then again, if we push it there will be some incentive to fix it. On a similar veign: I've reported some QA issues some time ago in recipes that I have no affinity with, but they seem to be ignored. Frans.