From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pradyumna Sampath Subject: Re: preempt rt in commercial use Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:45:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100914094411.GB10841@pengutronix.de> <4C8F8500.5070002@theptrgroup.com> <201009141830.03206@zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su> <4C8F8B79.1010300@theptrgroup.com> <4C8FF52E.1030407@us.ibm.com> <4C907A51.1050305@steinhoff.de> <4C90D392.8040808@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Armin Steinhoff , Jeff Angielski , "Nikita V. Youshchenko" , Robert Schwebel , Raz , linux-rt-users To: Nivedita Singhvi Return-path: Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:62752 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754292Ab0IOOp6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:45:58 -0400 Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so202798qwh.19 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 07:45:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C90D392.8040808@us.ibm.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi all, On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Nivedita Singhvi wrote: > At some stage this might have been a pretty good response time. > But HW improves by leaps and bounds, and what was considered "fast" > or "real-time" 25 years ago might be your average vanilla desktop > box speed of today. This has been an interesting conversation. Would be nice to know more deployments of RT_PREEMPT in various application areas. I have created a wiki page on http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/ , https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Systems_based_on_Real_time_preempt_Linux . Please feel free to update it as and when you encounter / build / read about interesting usage of RT_PREEMPT. If its painful for you to login and edit the page, just drop me or this list a note and either me or someone will update the page. best regards /prady -- http://www.prady.in