From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-iw0-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDjqP-0002Ka-6t for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:22:06 +0100 Received: by iwn42 with SMTP id 42so1206602iwn.6 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:21:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BitdMKbCBRVS/BD/lovXoRFVf+8EAywALsmq+p/I2Pw=; b=syNe6D5dBmYdMueqeamNj1U7Y1UGZ0nR13d/IYBtmDR39a5S1l/Vca7pF0FNUZYh6C ypfaJ4XOQPRU5F9D3b4665xqM5tGQAHY4LgGjeZ/Svq5KjD6qq1pXjtU3DZfPY7LpKoC MYLuCwHWndwoQRMX2SGlHL+DUnimiSjyhmuLY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=lRxt91advCUrKT8tgbkx8ySixoZLVX+r+KuVcpeESVP6EjpW9o7g2BpfmUhPW2hVlL pp/zSJ7jehnICaWVO1XTFWGCmGsni/4gUeKJKI4Max45Y/JkOVeVlztQzgv6BApSsLt/ JBwbfWJaoYKzAyJDFpL3q2cBwZVVBeIs1Q/h8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.17.203 with SMTP id t11mr8240899iba.1.1288815675503; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:21:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.40.13 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:21:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CCF64DD.9080709@gmail.com> <20101103154735.GE3440@jama> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:21:15 +0100 Message-ID: From: Frans Meulenbroeks To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.214.175 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: fransmeulenbroeks@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gphoto2_2.4.8.bb: Stop configure from looking in /usr/local/include X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:22:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2010/11/3 Khem Raj : > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks > wrote: >> 2010/11/3 Khem Raj : >> >>> >>> yes a more detailed solution is better. you have to go through the >>> configure of every >>> package and understand the behavior then act upon. As I said before >>> its a tedious task >>> >> I'm well aware of this. That is also why in the infrastructure thread >> I suggested using automated testing to find misbehaving packages. >> >> Btw there are 355 .inc files that contain the word autotools and 1899 .bb files. >> Of course there are lots of dups in there. >> And maybe for the base recipes we can convince the yocto people that >> this is a serious QA issue (and they have some people employed to work >> on this if I understood properly). >> > > numbers means not so much when it comes down to this. I don't know if > any distribution that even does that > so I take comfort in everyone being wrong. > I agree that numbers don't mean that much. Just wanted to give an indication of the possible effort needed. Also no idea how debian does this. One way to get a minimal package is to have everything in packaged staging then bake the recipe. that'll only drag in stuff from depends. Frans