From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mohammed Shafi <shafi.ath9k@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:55:03 +0530
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Progress on Ath9k HT support on Adhoc mode
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=m0Hdf301ic9ei6YaVs7xv=GRbbfArp2g2GyBt@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=m0Hdf301ic9ei6YaVs7xv=GRbbfArp2g2GyBt@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTincZ1-+4Nu3aXB7jvjQMcp7AY+=QmZ70giHApOR@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Baldomero Coll <baldo.ath9k@gmail.com> wrote:
> Has anyone of you been able to capture the frames generated withing the HT
> IBSS network?
>
> I'm using Wireshark wireshark 1.2.7 and kismet 2011-01, and there is no way
> of captruring the data frames, although the beacons are well captured.

make use of this command  for the sniffer, based on your ad-hoc
networks channel and mode
iw dev <devname> set channel <channel> [HT20|HT40+|HT40-]



>
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel at lists.ath9k.org
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
>
>