From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37620 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PipCv-0003kD-3H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:21:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PipCt-0005OO-H9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:21:48 -0500 Received: from mail-wy0-f173.google.com ([74.125.82.173]:61446) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PipCt-0005OH-CF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:21:47 -0500 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so3345333wyg.4 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 06:21:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: tamura.yoshiaki@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <4D42C5B0.6000007@redhat.com> References: <4D412CF0.30706@redhat.com> <20110127182233.GB5228@redhat.com> <4D4293D6.2080802@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4D42C5B0.6000007@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 23:21:46 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull? From: Yoshiaki Tamura Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Kevin Wolf , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel , Markus Armbruster , Gerd Hoffmann 2011/1/28 Paolo Bonzini : > On 01/28/2011 11:00 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> >> 28.01.2011 11:06, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: >> [] >>> >>> I would like Kemari to be included for 0.14. =A0Thanks to many >>> valuable comments from various reviewers, it got better than >>> ever, I believe. =A0For those who may object, it wouldn't affect >>> any functions including live migration unless one turns it on. >>> Besides, it is a good application of live migration. =A0By having >>> merged, I would be able to focus on increasing functionality and >>> optimization. >> >> It's somewhat unexpected to see merge request for any new >> functionality into a "stable" branch. =A0Having nothing bad >> against Kemari, I still think we shouldn't include any new >> functionality into 0.14, which were planned to be released >> before new year... ;) >> >> I mean, if it were not merged so far, for reasons that can >> be discussed separately etc, regardless of its good shape >> and so on... let's don't do any last-minute merges. > > To be fair to Yoshiaki, the first 17 patches in his 19-patch series have = no > impact on the operation of QEMU, and even the last two are Kemari-only. = =A0I > know almost nothing about Kemari so I cannot comment on the technical sid= e > of those patches, only that it w^Hshouldn't be destabilizing. =A0I made s= ome > comments on a couple of patches, so I'm inclined to say no as well. I don't have any intention to destabilize qemu, so I'm happy to follow what people think appropriate. > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/91096 should be appl= ied > in any case, as it is a regression from 0.12. Oops, I forgot to list it :) Thanks for catching. Yoshi > > Paolo > >