From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755604Ab0KMXSL (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Nov 2010 18:18:11 -0500 Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:42864 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754053Ab0KMXSH (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Nov 2010 18:18:07 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=dMsJw7IFIpqWXS9ELX7yz+fxd+IEK3yMywwQd6VYivGYs9g3U4N8Ivk4DdKSbwx7Af rZM0mdjQJwYnS10KrtNgUGAIYpLc5hzOO6JMybEKz2lRMn8ng260joLs5Kk398ZQ8yly ENNnRmrwpLVxJNT7XDCY/Q4JLiOkZ5zmZSgJU= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4CC9E8C7.60306@suse.cz> References: <20100831083844.043619334@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20101018103729.GA4122@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20101019110801.GA4128@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20101019213112.GA11432@merkur.ravnborg.org> <4CC8ABC7.5030003@suse.cz> <20101028203542.GA30879@merkur.ravnborg.org> <4CC9E8C7.60306@suse.cz> From: Mike Frysinger Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 18:17:44 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] initramfs: Fix build break on symbol-prefixed archs To: Michal Marek Cc: Sam Ravnborg , Hendrik Brueckner , Michael Holzheu , tabbott@ksplice.com, vda.linux@googlemail.com, hpa@linux.intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 17:19, Michal Marek wrote: > On 28.10.2010 22:35, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:46:31AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: >>> On 27.10.2010 20:23, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>>> can we get this change dropped from linux-next until someone gets a >>>> chance to fix it ? >>> >>> Sorry I missed this thread. So your last patch >>> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/19/488) did fix the Blackfin build >>> failure? Can you submit it with a proper Signed-off-by and changelog? >> >> Did you see the patch I posted in: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/19/534 >> >> The one that fix up the cppflags usage. >> >> I think this will solve the issue with blackfin nicely - and >> make use of cppflags more as expected. > > As Mike noted - your patch does not strip the double quotes. And Mike's > patch is really minimal, it just adds the SYMBOL_PREFIX definition to > _a_flags. I'll look at your patch after this merge window. why am i seeing __initramfs_size failures in mainline now ? -mike