From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com ([209.85.216.182]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHiBq-0003rD-TU for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 20:24:39 +0100 Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so1144729qyk.6 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 11:23:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.202.3 with SMTP id fc3mr4941122qab.64.1289762615001; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 11:23:35 -0800 (PST) Sender: jay@jay-tech.ru Received: by 10.220.95.74 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 11:23:34 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [93.81.138.51] In-Reply-To: <4CE02C8A.2040002@mentor.com> References: <4CE02C8A.2040002@mentor.com> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:23:34 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZOC3LZzHi_gdESylcC-n2ZGWE_Y Message-ID: From: Yury Bushmelev To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.216.182 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jay@jay-tech.ru X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: testing branch 2010-11-12 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 19:24:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/11/14 Tom Rini : > On 11/14/2010 11:11 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> >> 2010/11/12 Cliff Brake: >>> >>> testing-next is ready for clean builds. =A0Not many builds succeeded >>> last week--I suspect people have been busy: >> >> Actually my builds also succeeded (apart from the neek one which seem >> to require some more love). The autobuilder did it's job quite nicely, >> but I was just not around to verify the results and update the page. >> The neek requires at least the os2 patch. >> >> Testing 2010-11-12 gives the same results. updated the testing page. > > After my first week of doing some testing branch test builds I was thinki= ng, > would some form of either automated result submitting or form-based resul= t > submitting be a good idea? =A0We could try and use a google doc spreadshe= et / > form, for example. =A0Thoughts? I'll prefer to use our oestats-server to auto-publish builds data. Oestats have complete information about builds. --=20 Yury Bushmelev