From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dima Zavin Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Nexus One Support Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:15:42 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1295576730.4096.24.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295624801.19880.13.camel@m0nster> <20110121094827.41818a55@jbarnes-desktop> <20110121095658.1ab623fe@jbarnes-desktop> <1295632828.19880.22.camel@m0nster> <20110121100441.06a94482@jbarnes-desktop> <1295633882.19880.31.camel@m0nster> <1295642995.19880.42.camel@m0nster> <20110121234930.GK3043@thunk.org> <1295684398.19231.47.camel@jaguar> <1295719626.2827.18.camel@gnutoo-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([74.125.121.67]:43330 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751116Ab1AVSPp convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 13:15:45 -0500 Received: from hpaq1.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq1.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.1]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p0MIFiLF004828 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:15:44 -0800 Received: from qyk27 (qyk27.prod.google.com [10.241.83.155]) by hpaq1.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p0MIF0Ff025655 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:15:43 -0800 Received: by qyk27 with SMTP id 27so3194804qyk.15 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:15:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1295719626.2827.18.camel@gnutoo-laptop> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Pekka Enberg , Ted Ts'o , Daniel Walker , Jesse Barnes , Joe Perches , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidb@codeaurora.org Denis, Your approach would have been fine as well. Some mechanism to point out where the original lives like pasting a link saying 'Original code can be found in " or "Based on the code as found in " as you did would have also been enough as well. --Dima On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: > On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 18:28 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> I really appreciate the well structured effort which Daniel is putti= ng >> into this. > Me too. > > > I've an issue similar to the problem mentioned in this thread: > I own a board which came,by default with a 2.6.27 kernel. > A developer of the company that produced and sell the board ported th= e > board to the 2.6.30 kernel during his spare time(if I remember well) > The patch is publicly available in their svn tree in the form of a > standard unified diff patch(not a git patch) > > Is that the proper format for the commit message: > =A0 =A0mx31: add support for the bugbase 1.3 from buglabs > > =A0 =A0This work was based on bug-linux-2.6.30.patch that can be foun= d > =A0 =A0 =A0in buglabs's svn here: > =A0 =A0 =A0svn://bugcamp.net/bug/branches/izzy/experimental > > =A0 =A0Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli > > The work I did was porting forward the board initialization code and = the > serial port support from 2.6.30 to linux-next. > I debugged(with md in uboot to get the printk buffer) the fact that t= he > serial didn't work,and removed unneeded code to make it work. > > I've not submitted yet the work because of this thread, > thanks to Russell King's response I think I'll submit it. > > > Here's another commit I made and that went into mainline: > commit 9df86e2e702c6d5547aced7f241addd2d698bb11 > Author: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli > Date: =A0 Fri Aug 27 23:48:19 2010 +0200 > > wl1251: Fix queue stopping/waking for TX path > > This patch was adapted from 06f7bc7db79fabe6b2ec16eff0f59e4acc21eb72 > (from linus's linux-2.6 tree of kernel.org) > > here's the original message: > =A0 =A0The queue stopping/waking functionality was broken in a way th= at > could > =A0 =A0cause huge latencies in TX transfers and even cause the TX to = stall > in the > =A0 =A0right circumstances. Correct these problems. > > Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli > Acked-by: Kalle Valo > Signed-off-by: John W. Linville > > In this commit I was told not to put the original sign-off, authors > etc... > This is because it would have been confusing and misleading: > It would have appeared like if the commit got Ack,Sign-off etc... by = the > people involved in the original commit. > > Denis. > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752925Ab1AVSPr (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 13:15:47 -0500 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.44.51]:58172 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752123Ab1AVSPp convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 13:15:45 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YZzmriscC22+Y9soMakZ54CHs3LsbNobmr8whh9BM/Rt751qieBBjXd+lNG+NxuERX 7IDgS0A0H/6fpmyzMhBQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1295719626.2827.18.camel@gnutoo-laptop> References: <1295576730.4096.24.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295624801.19880.13.camel@m0nster> <20110121094827.41818a55@jbarnes-desktop> <20110121095658.1ab623fe@jbarnes-desktop> <1295632828.19880.22.camel@m0nster> <20110121100441.06a94482@jbarnes-desktop> <1295633882.19880.31.camel@m0nster> <1295642995.19880.42.camel@m0nster> <20110121234930.GK3043@thunk.org> <1295684398.19231.47.camel@jaguar> <1295719626.2827.18.camel@gnutoo-laptop> Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:15:42 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Nexus One Support From: Dima Zavin To: "Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli" Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Pekka Enberg , "Ted Ts'o" , Daniel Walker , Jesse Barnes , Joe Perches , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidb@codeaurora.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Denis, Your approach would have been fine as well. Some mechanism to point out where the original lives like pasting a link saying 'Original code can be found in " or "Based on the code as found in " as you did would have also been enough as well. --Dima On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: > On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 18:28 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> I really appreciate the well structured effort which Daniel is putting >> into this. > Me too. > > > I've an issue similar to the problem mentioned in this thread: > I own a board which came,by default with a 2.6.27 kernel. > A developer of the company that produced and sell the board ported the > board to the 2.6.30 kernel during his spare time(if I remember well) > The patch is publicly available in their svn tree in the form of a > standard unified diff patch(not a git patch) > > Is that the proper format for the commit message: >    mx31: add support for the bugbase 1.3 from buglabs > >    This work was based on bug-linux-2.6.30.patch that can be found >      in buglabs's svn here: >      svn://bugcamp.net/bug/branches/izzy/experimental > >    Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli > > The work I did was porting forward the board initialization code and the > serial port support from 2.6.30 to linux-next. > I debugged(with md in uboot to get the printk buffer) the fact that the > serial didn't work,and removed unneeded code to make it work. > > I've not submitted yet the work because of this thread, > thanks to Russell King's response I think I'll submit it. > > > Here's another commit I made and that went into mainline: > commit 9df86e2e702c6d5547aced7f241addd2d698bb11 > Author: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli > Date:   Fri Aug 27 23:48:19 2010 +0200 > > wl1251: Fix queue stopping/waking for TX path > > This patch was adapted from 06f7bc7db79fabe6b2ec16eff0f59e4acc21eb72 > (from linus's linux-2.6 tree of kernel.org) > > here's the original message: >    The queue stopping/waking functionality was broken in a way that > could >    cause huge latencies in TX transfers and even cause the TX to stall > in the >    right circumstances. Correct these problems. > > Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli > Acked-by: Kalle Valo > Signed-off-by: John W. Linville > > In this commit I was told not to put the original sign-off, authors > etc... > This is because it would have been confusing and misleading: > It would have appeared like if the commit got Ack,Sign-off etc... by the > people involved in the original commit. > > Denis. > > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dmitriyz@google.com (Dima Zavin) Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:15:42 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 0/7] Nexus One Support In-Reply-To: <1295719626.2827.18.camel@gnutoo-laptop> References: <1295576730.4096.24.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295624801.19880.13.camel@m0nster> <20110121094827.41818a55@jbarnes-desktop> <20110121095658.1ab623fe@jbarnes-desktop> <1295632828.19880.22.camel@m0nster> <20110121100441.06a94482@jbarnes-desktop> <1295633882.19880.31.camel@m0nster> <1295642995.19880.42.camel@m0nster> <20110121234930.GK3043@thunk.org> <1295684398.19231.47.camel@jaguar> <1295719626.2827.18.camel@gnutoo-laptop> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Denis, Your approach would have been fine as well. Some mechanism to point out where the original lives like pasting a link saying 'Original code can be found in " or "Based on the code as found in " as you did would have also been enough as well. --Dima On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: > On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 18:28 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> I really appreciate the well structured effort which Daniel is putting >> into this. > Me too. > > > I've an issue similar to the problem mentioned in this thread: > I own a board which came,by default with a 2.6.27 kernel. > A developer of the company that produced and sell the board ported the > board to the 2.6.30 kernel during his spare time(if I remember well) > The patch is publicly available in their svn tree in the form of a > standard unified diff patch(not a git patch) > > Is that the proper format for the commit message: > ? ?mx31: add support for the bugbase 1.3 from buglabs > > ? ?This work was based on bug-linux-2.6.30.patch that can be found > ? ? ?in buglabs's svn here: > ? ? ?svn://bugcamp.net/bug/branches/izzy/experimental > > ? ?Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli > > The work I did was porting forward the board initialization code and the > serial port support from 2.6.30 to linux-next. > I debugged(with md in uboot to get the printk buffer) the fact that the > serial didn't work,and removed unneeded code to make it work. > > I've not submitted yet the work because of this thread, > thanks to Russell King's response I think I'll submit it. > > > Here's another commit I made and that went into mainline: > commit 9df86e2e702c6d5547aced7f241addd2d698bb11 > Author: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli > Date: ? Fri Aug 27 23:48:19 2010 +0200 > > wl1251: Fix queue stopping/waking for TX path > > This patch was adapted from 06f7bc7db79fabe6b2ec16eff0f59e4acc21eb72 > (from linus's linux-2.6 tree of kernel.org) > > here's the original message: > ? ?The queue stopping/waking functionality was broken in a way that > could > ? ?cause huge latencies in TX transfers and even cause the TX to stall > in the > ? ?right circumstances. Correct these problems. > > Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli > Acked-by: Kalle Valo > Signed-off-by: John W. Linville > > In this commit I was told not to put the original sign-off, authors > etc... > This is because it would have been confusing and misleading: > It would have appeared like if the commit got Ack,Sign-off etc... by the > people involved in the original commit. > > Denis. > > >