All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@whamcloud.com>
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 26/29] lustre: osc_cache: simplify osc_page_gang_lookup()
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 02:40:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AECE9036-4F2A-4330-A8AD-3105A3D4014C@whamcloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154701504269.26726.8061168646539306509.stgit@noble>

On Jan 8, 2019, at 23:24, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> wrote:
> 
> osc_page_gang_lookup() has 4 values that it can receive from a
> callback, and that it can return to the caller:
> 	CLP_GANG_OKAY,
> 	CLP_GANG_RESCHED,
> 	CLP_GANG_AGAIN,
> 	CLP_GANG_ABORT
> 
> "AGAIN" is never used.
> "RESCHED" is not needed as a cond_resched() can safely be called at
> the point this is returned, rather than returning it.
> That leaves "OKAY" and "ABORT" which can simply by "true" and "false"
> boolean values.
> 
> Internalizing the RESCHED case means the callers don't need to loop
> themselves.  This simplify calling patterns.
> 
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/cl_object.h  |    7 ----
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_cache.c      |   40 ++++++++------------
> .../staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_cl_internal.h    |   10 +++--
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_io.c         |    4 +-
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_lock.c       |   27 ++++++--------
> 5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_cache.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_cache.c
> index 79bcaa212339..e01f3815978c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_cache.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_cache.c
> @@ -3069,10 +3065,10 @@ int osc_page_gang_lookup(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_io *io,
> 		if (nr < OTI_PVEC_SIZE || end_of_region)
> 			break;
> 
> -		if (res == CLP_GANG_OKAY && need_resched())
> -			res = CLP_GANG_RESCHED;
> -		if (res != CLP_GANG_OKAY)
> +		if (!res)
> 			break;
> +		if (need_resched())
> +			cond_resched();
> 
> 		spin_lock(&osc->oo_tree_lock);
> 		tree_lock = true;

The one thing I notice here is that if the CLP_GANG_RESCHED is not
returned to the caller, it doesn't have the chance to finish the
work before it is rescheduled:

        do {
                res = osc_page_gang_lookup(env, io, osc,
                                   info->oti_next_index, end, cb, osc);
                if (info->oti_next_index > end)
                        break;

                if (res == CLP_GANG_RESCHED)
                        cond_resched();
        } while (res != CLP_GANG_OKAY);

That means if the thread did a lot of work in osc_page_gang_lookup()
but is otherwise finished, it will block at the internal cond_resched()
rather than detecting it is finishing and returning to the caller without
any reschedule at all.

However, looking into the osc_page_gang_lookup() code more closely, I
see "end_of_region" would already be set in this case (it is just at
the start of the context in the above patch hunk) so CLP_GANG_RESCHED
should never be set in that case.  So it looks OK.

Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@whamcloud.com>

> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_lock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_lock.c
> index 4cc813d192d9..1eab61d720e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_lock.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_lock.c
> @@ -630,18 +630,18 @@ static int osc_ldlm_glimpse_ast(struct ldlm_lock *dlmlock, void *data)
> 	return result;
> }
> 
> -static int weigh_cb(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_io *io,
> -		    struct osc_page *ops, void *cbdata)
> +static bool weigh_cb(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_io *io,
> +		     struct osc_page *ops, void *cbdata)
> {
> 	struct cl_page *page = ops->ops_cl.cpl_page;
> 
> 	if (cl_page_is_vmlocked(env, page) ||
> 	    PageDirty(page->cp_vmpage) || PageWriteback(page->cp_vmpage)
> 	   )

This is a bit oddly formatted.  I see in our tree it looks like:

        if (cl_page_is_vmlocked(env, page) || PageDirty(page->cp_vmpage) ||
            PageWriteback(page->cp_vmpage))

which is more normal.

> @@ -660,19 +660,14 @@ static unsigned long osc_lock_weight(const struct lu_env *env,
> 		return result;
> 
> 	page_index = cl_index(obj, extent->start);
> +
> +	result = osc_page_gang_lookup(env, io, oscobj,
> +				      page_index,
> +				      cl_index(obj, extent->end),
> +				      weigh_cb, (void *)&page_index);
> 	cl_io_fini(env, io);
> 
> -	return result == CLP_GANG_ABORT ? 1 : 0;
> +	return result ? 1 : 0;
> }

Per your commit comment above:

> That leaves "OKAY" and "ABORT" which can simply by "true" and "false"
> boolean values.

So if "ABORT" is now "false", this should be:

	return !result;

otherwise your return code logic is backward?

Cheers, Andreas
---
Andreas Dilger
Principal Lustre Architect
Whamcloud

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-10  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-09  6:24 [lustre-devel] [PATCH 00/29] assorted osc cleanups NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 01/29] lustre: osc_cache: discard oe_intree NeilBrown
2019-01-10  1:57   ` Andreas Dilger
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 06/29] lustre: osc: use overlapped() consistently NeilBrown
2019-01-10  2:01   ` Andreas Dilger
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 09/29] lustre: osc: remove test on 'found' being an error NeilBrown
2019-01-10  2:07   ` Andreas Dilger
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 05/29] lustre: osc: convert oe_refc and oe_users to kref and refcount_ NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 10/29] lustre: osc_cache: avoid list_for_each_entry_safe when clearing list NeilBrown
2019-01-10  2:10   ` Andreas Dilger
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 02/29] lustre: osc_cache: use assert_spin_locked() NeilBrown
2019-01-10  1:56   ` Andreas Dilger
2019-01-10  5:04     ` NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 07/29] lustre: osc: convert a while loop to for NeilBrown
2019-01-10  2:04   ` Andreas Dilger
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 11/29] lustre: osc_cache: simplify osc_wake_cache_waiters() NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 04/29] lustre: osc: simplify list manipulation NeilBrown
2019-01-10  1:58   ` Andreas Dilger
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 12/29] lustre: osc_cache: avoid confusing variable reuse NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 08/29] lustre: osc: simplify osc_extent_find() NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 03/29] lustre: osc: simplify osc_extent_wait() NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 13/29] lustre: osc_cache: change osc_enter_cache_try to return bool NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 18/29] lustre: osc_cache: avoid unnecessary tests NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 21/29] lustre: osc_cache: don't drop a lock we didn't take - two NeilBrown
2019-01-10  2:03   ` Andreas Dilger
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 20/29] lustre: osc_cache: don't drop a lock we didn't take NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 17/29] lustre: osc_cache: simplify list walk in get_write_extents() NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 24/29] lustre: osc_cache: change need_release to bool NeilBrown
2019-01-10  2:43   ` Andreas Dilger
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 19/29] lustre: osc_cache: convert while to for in get_write_extents() NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 27/29] lustre: osc_cache: white-space and other checkpatch fixes NeilBrown
2019-01-10  2:12   ` Andreas Dilger
2019-01-11  0:48     ` NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 15/29] lustre: osc_cache: change osc_make_rpc() to return bool NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 25/29] lustre: remove cl_page_cancel() NeilBrown
2019-01-10  3:15   ` Andreas Dilger
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 22/29] lustre: osc_cache: osc_prep_async_page() has meaningless return NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 14/29] lustre: osc_cache: convert cl_cache_waiters to a wait_queue NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 16/29] lustre: osc_cache: use osc_makes_hprpc() more consistently NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 23/29] lustre: osc_cache: remove 'transient' arg from osc_enter_cache_try NeilBrown
2019-01-10  3:02   ` Andreas Dilger
2019-01-10  4:04     ` NeilBrown
2019-01-11  0:27     ` NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 28/29] lustre: osc_request: assorted white-space and check-patch fixes NeilBrown
2019-01-10  2:19   ` Andreas Dilger
2019-01-10  5:25     ` NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 26/29] lustre: osc_cache: simplify osc_page_gang_lookup() NeilBrown
2019-01-10  2:40   ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2019-01-11  1:11     ` NeilBrown
2019-01-11  3:54       ` Andreas Dilger
2019-01-30  3:02         ` NeilBrown
2019-01-09  6:24 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 29/29] lustre: centralize handling of PTLRPCD_SET NeilBrown
2019-01-10  2:23   ` Andreas Dilger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AECE9036-4F2A-4330-A8AD-3105A3D4014C@whamcloud.com \
    --to=adilger@whamcloud.com \
    --cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.