From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756031AbbA2PdD (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:33:03 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:57797 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755787AbbA2PdA convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:33:00 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,486,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="669751459" From: "Ong, Boon Leong" To: "Bryan O'Donoghue" CC: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "x86@kernel.org" , "dvhart@infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andy Shevchenko , Ingo Molnar Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000 Thread-Topic: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000 Thread-Index: AQHQOylqnLZVjTv+WEq44p1GA6waZpzWMk6AgAAoNgCAAAEsAIAAwdXQ//+UzICAAIb+4A== Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:32:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1422470186-7860-1-git-send-email-pure.logic@nexus-software.ie> <1422470186-7860-2-git-send-email-pure.logic@nexus-software.ie> <20150129074411.GA4817@gmail.com> <54CA0782.8000807@nexus-software.ie> <54CA502D.9030307@nexus-software.ie> In-Reply-To: <54CA502D.9030307@nexus-software.ie> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.30.20.206] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >-----Original Message----- >From: Bryan O'Donoghue [mailto:pure.logic@nexus-software.ie] >Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 11:22 PM >To: Ong, Boon Leong >Cc: Thomas Gleixner; Ingo Molnar; H. Peter Anvin; x86@kernel.org; >dvhart@infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Andy Shevchenko; Ingo >Molnar >Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000 > >On 29/01/15 13:47, Ong, Boon Leong wrote: >> Bryan, >> >> Once you have the next revision ready, I would like to test it on my end across >both Galileo Gen v1 & v2. >> >> Cheers, >> BL > >Andy/BL - thanks for taking the time to test. > >I may end up dropping the imr_del_range() tests based on index as a result of >changing the external interface as suggested by Ingo. It would be nice to have two variants (1) index based & (2) address based. > >If you guys have a clear preference to keep those tests shout now and I'll re- >merge the imr_selftest code into the main chunk of IMR code. Ok, once you have that ready, I will re-run the test on my end. > >-- >BOD