From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SILKn-0007kH-Uf for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:49:18 +0200 Received: by wera1 with SMTP id a1so1316329wer.6 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:39:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=pQd6Kz29zVsBY97yGrZDyZg5HEGEg9otOJqE5h3mHjk=; b=o0IeFzj3pKZG0v3gpJZT9lv3tkj14LsJoQApOPQskE8v/gu0fou9dEYXUgfufT+Ptl 75ZCU74isAMFaN3KjfwgDLG2W3haAIkO15u/qmYuUL3HEu/0UF0Hd1czpU7v2NOdv0rP /UsXMUSjx4di8GNepbzESA6OajOlXeznGKcdd6CJx5IoAbroxGWJJGuxtJwOQRBg8xhA 5L5bxzfmfcQjKTB+KvshUahCdg9fO6zI6kB5JnMgtOdIU5/17W9NiMDgehw/Czl8csvs efZczM7W5exL5l3i4I0ZoENGtuEe6PrWwhpsCcqSrc+QGzY8Q51khF2E9TER7oIdkElF d8fQ== Received: by 10.216.132.40 with SMTP id n40mr1654571wei.68.1334241596657; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:39:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.1.36] (ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl. [84.80.112.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n8sm22212993wix.10.2012.04.12.07.39.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) From: Koen Kooi In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:39:52 +0200 Message-Id: References: <7E680CB2A76BB8438D08CF13C09FC53A46B06325@FMSMSX151.amr.corp.intel.com> <4F84D58F.8020608@gmail.com> <1334221321.31685.24.camel@ted> <4543FDF1-0512-4B36-ABB3-DBB957B86E88@dominion.thruhere.net> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmAQh+4AZNGdRkQn7zF+3j6Cvaz8YULLcsIAD9SzCEHN6nTtEIf/HE4C+YHpOacEk7H1JRY Subject: Re: Yocto Project 1.2 M4 schedule X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:49:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Op 12 apr. 2012, om 16:24 heeft Otavio Salvador het volgende geschreven: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 06:29, Koen Kooi = wrote: >> I'm still a big fan of using 'yoctoproject-1.2' as substring for tags = and branches. The objections I heard to that didn't make sense to me, = but I see this as a purely technical matter where others see it as = something different :) >=20 > OE-Core branch could be 2012-1. Yes, but experience has shown that PHBs and new yocto users want to see = 'yocto' in the name and go apeshit when it's missing. OTOH people will = hate whatever gets chosen, so let's get this over with and pick a name = and strongly recommend other layers to adopt it as well.=20 We can't do worse than fedora: = http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2012-February/003044.htm= l=