All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuval Mintz <yuvalm@mellanox.com>
To: Steve Lin <steven.lin1@broadcom.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"michael.chan@broadcom.com" <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
	"linville@tuxdriver.com" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	"gospo@broadcom.com" <gospo@broadcom.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] devlink: Add permanent config parameter get/set operations
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 20:21:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM0PR0502MB3683FB1536D1A204E5D1369EBF420@AM0PR0502MB3683.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1508440630-25830-2-git-send-email-steven.lin1@broadcom.com>

> Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] devlink: Add permanent config parameter
> get/set operations
> 
> Add support for permanent config parameter get/set commands. Used
> for parameters held in NVRAM, persistent device configuration.

Given some of the attributes aren't Boolean, what about an API that
allows the user to learn of supported values per option?
Otherwise only way for configuring some of them would be trial & error.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Steve Lin <steven.lin1@broadcom.com>
> Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@broadcom.com>
> ---
>  include/net/devlink.h        |   3 +
>  include/uapi/linux/devlink.h |  11 ++
>  net/core/devlink.c           | 234
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 248 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
> index b9654e1..bd64623 100644
> --- a/include/net/devlink.h
> +++ b/include/net/devlink.h
> @@ -270,6 +270,9 @@ struct devlink_ops {
>  	int (*eswitch_inline_mode_set)(struct devlink *devlink, u8
> inline_mode);
>  	int (*eswitch_encap_mode_get)(struct devlink *devlink, u8
> *p_encap_mode);
>  	int (*eswitch_encap_mode_set)(struct devlink *devlink, u8
> encap_mode);
> +	int (*perm_config_get)(struct devlink *devlink, u32 param, u32
> *value);
> +	int (*perm_config_set)(struct devlink *devlink, u32 param, u32
> value,
> +			       u8 *restart_reqd);
>  };
> 
>  static inline void *devlink_priv(struct devlink *devlink)
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
> index 0cbca96..47cc584 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
> @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@ enum devlink_command {
>  	DEVLINK_CMD_DPIPE_HEADERS_GET,
>  	DEVLINK_CMD_DPIPE_TABLE_COUNTERS_SET,
> 
> +	/* Permanent (NVRAM) device config get/set */
> +	DEVLINK_CMD_PERM_CONFIG_GET,
> +	DEVLINK_CMD_PERM_CONFIG_SET,
> +
>  	/* add new commands above here */
>  	__DEVLINK_CMD_MAX,
>  	DEVLINK_CMD_MAX = __DEVLINK_CMD_MAX - 1
> @@ -202,6 +206,13 @@ enum devlink_attr {
> 
>  	DEVLINK_ATTR_ESWITCH_ENCAP_MODE,	/* u8 */
> 
> +	/* Permanent Configuration Parameters */
> +	DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIGS,			/* nested */
> +	DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG,			/* nested */
> +	DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG_PARAMETER,		/* u32 */
> +	DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG_VALUE,			/*
> u32 */
> +	DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG_RESTART_REQUIRED,	/* u8 */
> +
>  	/* add new attributes above here, update the policy in devlink.c */
> 
>  	__DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX,
> diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
> index 7d430c1..c2cc7c6 100644
> --- a/net/core/devlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
> @@ -1566,6 +1566,224 @@ static int
> devlink_nl_cmd_eswitch_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> +static const struct nla_policy devlink_nl_policy[DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX + 1];
> +
> +static int devlink_nl_single_param_get(struct sk_buff *msg,
> +				       struct devlink *devlink,
> +				       uint32_t param)
> +{
> +	u32 value;
> +	int err;
> +	const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;
> +	struct nlattr *param_attr;
> +
> +	err = ops->perm_config_get(devlink, param, &value);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	param_attr = nla_nest_start(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG);
> +	nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG_PARAMETER,
> param);
> +	nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG_VALUE, value);
> +	nla_nest_end(msg, param_attr);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int devlink_nl_config_get_fill(struct sk_buff *msg,
> +				      struct devlink *devlink,
> +				      enum devlink_command cmd,
> +				      struct genl_info *info)
> +{
> +	void *hdr;
> +	int err;
> +	struct nlattr *attr;
> +	int param_count = 0;
> +	struct nlattr *cfgparam_attr;
> +	int rem;
> +	struct nlattr *tb[DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX + 1];
> +	u32 param;
> +
> +	hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, info->snd_portid, info->snd_seq,
> +			  &devlink_nl_family, 0, cmd);
> +	if (!hdr) {
> +		err = -EMSGSIZE;
> +		goto nla_msg_failure;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = devlink_nl_put_handle(msg, devlink);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto nla_put_failure;
> +
> +	if (!info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIGS]) {
> +		/* No configuration parameters */
> +		goto nla_put_failure;
> +	}
> +
> +	cfgparam_attr = nla_nest_start(msg,
> DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIGS);
> +
> +	nla_for_each_nested(attr, info-
> >attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIGS],
> +			    rem) {
Isn't it possible that a response for a single request for multiple ATTRs
wouldn't fit in a single message?

> +		err = nla_parse_nested(tb, DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX, attr,
> +				       devlink_nl_policy, NULL);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto nla_nest_failure;
> +		if (!tb[DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG_PARAMETER])
> +			continue;
> +
> +		param =
> nla_get_u32(tb[DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG_PARAMETER]);
> +		err = devlink_nl_single_param_get(msg, devlink, param);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto nla_nest_failure;
> +		param_count++;

Looks like an unused parameter

> +	}
> +
> +	nla_nest_end(msg, cfgparam_attr);
> +
> +	genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
> +	return 0;
> +
> +nla_nest_failure:
> +	nla_nest_cancel(msg, cfgparam_attr);
> +nla_put_failure:
> +	genlmsg_cancel(msg, hdr);
> +nla_msg_failure:
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int devlink_nl_cmd_perm_config_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> +					       struct genl_info *info)
> +{
> +	struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
> +	struct sk_buff *msg;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (!devlink->ops || !devlink->ops->perm_config_get)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!msg)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	err = devlink_nl_config_get_fill(msg, devlink,
> +
> DEVLINK_CMD_PERM_CONFIG_GET, info);
> +
> +	if (err) {
> +		nlmsg_free(msg);
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	return genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
> +}
> +
> +static int devlink_nl_single_param_set(struct sk_buff *msg,
> +				       struct devlink *devlink,
> +				       u32 param, u32 value)
> +{
> +	u32 orig_value;
> +	u8 need_restart;
> +	int err;
> +	const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;
> +	struct nlattr *cfgparam_attr;
> +
> +	/* First get current value of parameter */
> +	err = ops->perm_config_get(devlink, param, &orig_value);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	/* Now set parameter */
> +	err = ops->perm_config_set(devlink, param, value, &need_restart);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	cfgparam_attr = nla_nest_start(msg,
> DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG);
> +	/* Update restart reqd - if any param needs restart, should be set */
> +	if (need_restart)
> +		err = nla_put_u8(msg,
> +
> DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG_RESTART_REQUIRED, 1);
> +
> +	/* Since set was successful, write attr back to msg with orig val */
> +	err = nla_put_u32(msg,
> DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG_PARAMETER, param);
> +	err = nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG_VALUE,
> orig_value);
> +
> +	nla_nest_end(msg, cfgparam_attr);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int devlink_nl_cmd_perm_config_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> +					       struct genl_info *info)
> +{
> +	struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
> +	struct sk_buff *msg;
> +	void *hdr;
> +	struct nlattr *attr;
> +	int rem;
> +	int err;
> +	u8 restart_reqd = 0;
> +	struct nlattr *cfgparam_attr;
> +	struct nlattr *tb[DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX + 1];
> +	u32 param;
> +	u32 value;
> +
> +	if (!devlink->ops || !devlink->ops->perm_config_get ||
> +	    !devlink->ops->perm_config_set)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!msg)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, info->snd_portid, info->snd_seq,
> +			  &devlink_nl_family, 0,
> DEVLINK_CMD_PERM_CONFIG_SET);
> +	if (!hdr) {
> +		err = -EMSGSIZE;
> +		goto nla_msg_failure;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = devlink_nl_put_handle(msg, devlink);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto nla_put_failure;
> +
> +	cfgparam_attr = nla_nest_start(msg,
> DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIGS);
> +
> +	nla_for_each_nested(attr, info-
> >attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIGS], rem) {
> +		err = nla_parse_nested(tb, DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX, attr,
> +				       devlink_nl_policy, NULL);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto nla_nest_failure;
> +
> +		if (!tb[DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG_PARAMETER] ||
> +		    !tb[DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG_VALUE])
> +			continue;
> +
> +		param =
> nla_get_u32(tb[DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG_PARAMETER]);
> +		value =
> nla_get_u32(tb[DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG_VALUE]);
> +		err = devlink_nl_single_param_set(msg, devlink, param,
> +						  value);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto nla_nest_failure;
> +	}
> +
> +	nla_nest_end(msg, cfgparam_attr);
> +
> +	if (restart_reqd) {

Doesn't seem like you're ever setting it.
A leftover from when this was an attribute of the configs instead
of per-config perhaps?

> +		err = nla_put_u8(msg,
> DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG_RESTART_REQUIRED,
> +				 restart_reqd);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto nla_put_failure;
> +	}
> +
> +	genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
> +	return genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
> +
> +nla_nest_failure:
> +	nla_nest_cancel(msg, cfgparam_attr);
> +nla_put_failure:
> +	genlmsg_cancel(msg, hdr);
> +nla_msg_failure:
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
>  int devlink_dpipe_match_put(struct sk_buff *skb,
>  			    struct devlink_dpipe_match *match)
>  {
> @@ -2291,6 +2509,8 @@ static const struct nla_policy
> devlink_nl_policy[DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
>  	[DEVLINK_ATTR_ESWITCH_ENCAP_MODE] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
>  	[DEVLINK_ATTR_DPIPE_TABLE_NAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING
> },
>  	[DEVLINK_ATTR_DPIPE_TABLE_COUNTERS_ENABLED] = { .type =
> NLA_U8 },
> +	[DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG_PARAMETER] = { .type = NLA_U32
> },
> +	[DEVLINK_ATTR_PERM_CONFIG_VALUE] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
>  };
> 
>  static const struct genl_ops devlink_nl_ops[] = {
> @@ -2451,6 +2671,20 @@ static const struct genl_ops devlink_nl_ops[] = {
>  		.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
>  		.internal_flags = DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NEED_DEVLINK,
>  	},
> +	{
> +		.cmd = DEVLINK_CMD_PERM_CONFIG_GET,
> +		.doit = devlink_nl_cmd_perm_config_get_doit,
> +		.policy = devlink_nl_policy,
> +		.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
> +		.internal_flags = DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NEED_DEVLINK,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.cmd = DEVLINK_CMD_PERM_CONFIG_SET,
> +		.doit = devlink_nl_cmd_perm_config_set_doit,
> +		.policy = devlink_nl_policy,
> +		.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
> +		.internal_flags = DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NEED_DEVLINK,
> +	},
>  };
> 
>  static struct genl_family devlink_nl_family __ro_after_init = {
> --
> 2.7.4

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-19 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-19 19:17 [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] Adding permanent config get/set to devlink Steve Lin
2017-10-19 19:17 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] devlink: Add permanent config parameter get/set operations Steve Lin
2017-10-19 20:21   ` Yuval Mintz [this message]
2017-10-20 13:11     ` Steve Lin
2017-10-21 14:12       ` Yuval Mintz
2017-10-23 15:27         ` Steve Lin
2017-10-20 14:39   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-10-20 15:13     ` Steve Lin
2017-10-21  9:24       ` Jiri Pirko
2017-10-23 14:05         ` Steve Lin
2017-10-19 19:17 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] devlink: Adding SR-IOV enablement NVRAM config param Steve Lin
2017-10-19 19:33   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-10-19 20:40     ` Steve Lin
2017-10-19 19:17 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] devlink: Adding num VFs per PF " Steve Lin
2017-10-19 19:17 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] devlink: Adding max PF MSI-X vectors " Steve Lin
2017-10-19 19:17 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] devlink: Adding num MSI-X vectors per VF " Steve Lin
2017-10-19 20:32   ` Yuval Mintz
2017-10-19 21:39     ` Jiri Pirko
2017-10-19 21:43       ` Jiri Pirko
2017-10-20  1:01         ` Florian Fainelli
2017-10-20  6:44           ` Jiri Pirko
2017-10-20 14:03       ` Steve Lin
2017-10-20 14:10         ` Jiri Pirko
2017-10-20 14:19           ` Steve Lin
2017-10-21 13:59             ` Yuval Mintz
2017-10-23 14:20               ` Steve Lin
2017-10-23 14:37                 ` Yuval Mintz
2017-10-23 16:35                   ` Steve Lin
2017-10-23 18:41                     ` Yuval Mintz
2017-10-19 19:17 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] bnxt: Add devlink support for config get/set Steve Lin
2017-10-19 19:35   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-10-19 20:40     ` Steve Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AM0PR0502MB3683FB1536D1A204E5D1369EBF420@AM0PR0502MB3683.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=yuvalm@mellanox.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gospo@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steven.lin1@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.