From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Parav Pandit Subject: RE: [PATCH mlx5-next 14/15] {IB, net}/mlx5: E-Switch, Use index of rep for vport to IB port mapping Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:47:42 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20190617192247.25107-1-saeedm@mellanox.com> <20190617192247.25107-15-saeedm@mellanox.com> <20190618104220.GH4690@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190618104220.GH4690@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Leon Romanovsky , Saeed Mahameed Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , Bodong Wang , Mark Bloch List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Hi Leon, > -----Original Message----- > From: Leon Romanovsky > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 4:12 PM > To: Saeed Mahameed > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; Bodong Wang > ; Parav Pandit ; Mark Bloch > > Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 14/15] {IB, net}/mlx5: E-Switch, Use index = of rep > for vport to IB port mapping >=20 > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 07:23:37PM +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > From: Bodong Wang > > > > In the single IB device mode, the mapping between vport number and rep > > relies on a counter. However for dynamic vport allocation, it is > > desired to keep consistent map of eswitch vport and IB port. > > > > Hence, simplify code to remove the free running counter and instead > > use the available vport index during load/unload sequence from the > > eswitch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bodong Wang > > Suggested-by: Parav Pandit > > Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit >=20 > We are not adding multiple "*-by" for same user, please choose one. >=20 Suggested-by was added by Bodong during our discussion. Later on when I did= gerrit +1, RB tag got added. > Thanks