All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Guy Levi(SW)" <guyle@mellanox.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Majd Dibbiny <majd@mellanox.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Subject: RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 12:25:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM0PR05MB533192C82AA04E89004251A1C7A80@AM0PR05MB5331.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181204015247.GR12288@mellanox.com>

> 
> Huh. So apparently every compiler that tested this patch (0-day, mine,
> the submitters) optimized this call away because is_atomic_response()
> always returns 0: meaning mlx5_get_atomic_laddr is never callable and
> can be deleted entirely, including the call to mlx5_get_send_wqe.
> 
> Not sure what compiler setup will hit this, but it is clearly wrong
> code..

Flag -o0  ?


> 
> Guy/Leon, please send a fixup.. Maybe just delete all this
> handle_atomics stuff?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jason

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-05 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-04  0:47 linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-04  1:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-12-04  9:42   ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-07  2:41     ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-05 12:25   ` Guy Levi(SW) [this message]
2018-12-05 22:58     ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-10  0:43       ` Changbin Du
2018-12-10 15:52       ` Masahiro Yamada
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-02-26  2:51 Stephen Rothwell
2020-02-26  3:04 ` Devesh Sharma
2020-02-26 17:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-09  3:30 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09  7:04 ` Mark Zhang
2019-07-09  7:18   ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-09 12:43     ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09 13:11       ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-09 12:46     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-10  1:04       ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-10  4:30         ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-16 23:28           ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-17  6:33             ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-07-17  7:45               ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08  3:03 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08 14:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-08  2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08 16:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-09  3:11   ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-25 18:32   ` Dennis Dalessandro
2019-07-01  4:14 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-01  7:54 ` wangxi
2019-07-01 22:49   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-04  2:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-04  2:04   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-04  2:10     ` oulijun
2019-07-04  4:07     ` wangxi
2019-07-04  4:10       ` wangxi
2019-07-04  6:31     ` oulijun
2019-07-05 13:15   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-05 14:59     ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-25  7:22 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-25  8:50 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-01-25 16:08   ` Doug Ledford
2017-07-31  2:07 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-21  1:42 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-21  1:58 ` Joe Perches
2017-04-21  2:21   ` Doug Ledford
2017-04-21  2:23     ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-21  2:21   ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-15  0:30 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-15  1:05 ` Doug Ledford
2017-02-15  5:09   ` Selvin Xavier
2016-09-27  1:23 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-27  5:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-27  5:48   ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-27 13:39     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-27 17:15       ` Doug Ledford
2016-09-28  1:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-28 15:00   ` Doug Ledford
2016-09-28 15:23     ` Greg KH
2016-09-28 15:26       ` Doug Ledford
2016-09-28 21:45     ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-16  1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-16  6:49 ` Herbert Xu
2016-03-16 19:02   ` Doug Ledford
2016-03-16 20:41     ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-16 22:14     ` Ismail, Mustafa
2016-01-13  1:35 Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-13  1:35 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AM0PR05MB533192C82AA04E89004251A1C7A80@AM0PR05MB5331.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=guyle@mellanox.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=leonro@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=majd@mellanox.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.