From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Qianyu Gong Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:32:54 +0000 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] armv8/fsl-layerscape: add IFC fixup for LS1043A with QSPI enabled In-Reply-To: References: <1456135520-48373-1-git-send-email-Qianyu.Gong@nxp.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Prabhakar, > -----Original Message----- > From: Prabhakar Kushwaha > Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:51 PM > To: Qianyu Gong ; u-boot at lists.denx.de; york sun > ; oss at buserror.net > Cc: Qianyu Gong ; Mingkai Hu > Subject: RE: [U-Boot] [PATCH] armv8/fsl-layerscape: add IFC fixup for LS1043A > with QSPI enabled > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: U-Boot [mailto:u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Gong > > Qianyu > > Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 3:35 PM > > To: u-boot at lists.denx.de; york sun ; > > oss at buserror.net > > Cc: Qianyu Gong ; Mingkai Hu > > Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] armv8/fsl-layerscape: add IFC fixup for > > LS1043A with QSPI enabled > > > > QSPI and IFC are pin-multiplexed on LS1043A. So if QSPI is enabled, > > IFC should be disabled. > > But just disable IFC driver in LS1043A Linux is not enough because > > mdio-mux will access IFC address space -- actually it accesses FPGA > > which is connected to IFC CS3. So disable the whole IFC node in Linux device tree. > > > > FPGA and NAND access are valid use-case during QSPI boot > > So why IFC controller is being disabled from device tree. > As Mingkai explained, neither FGPA nor NAND is valid when QSPI is enabled on LS1043AQDS. > > Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c > > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c > > index 4e4861d..5bb3048 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c > > @@ -204,4 +204,11 @@ void ft_cpu_setup(void *blob, bd_t *bd) #ifdef > > CONFIG_FSL_LSCH3 > > fdt_fixup_smmu(blob); > > #endif > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_LS1043A > > I will suggest to avoid SoC specific defines > > --prabhakar I think only LS1043A needs this fixup for the moment. So if there's any change on new chips, it wouldn't affect them. Regards, Qianyu